terested to know if anyone is using in large scale.
>
> Thanks,
> Weihao Li
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Justin Bertram
> Sent: Monday, August 31, 2020 1:24 PM
> To: users@activemq.apache.org
> Subject: Re: ActiveMQ Artemis Roadmap
>
> As far as
> Weihao Li
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Justin Bertram
> Sent: Monday, August 31, 2020 1:24 PM
> To: users@activemq.apache.org
> Subject: Re: ActiveMQ Artemis Roadmap
>
> As far as stability and "robustness" goes ActiveMQ Artemis is already
> production re
: ActiveMQ Artemis Roadmap
As far as stability and "robustness" goes ActiveMQ Artemis is already
production ready (and has been for a long time). The timeline for becoming
ActiveMQ 6 is based on sufficient feature parity with the 5.x code-base, not
general stability or production readines
As far as stability and "robustness" goes ActiveMQ Artemis is already
production ready (and has been for a long time). The timeline for becoming
ActiveMQ 6 is based on sufficient feature parity with the 5.x code-base,
not general stability or production readiness. Lots of users have deployed
Artemi
Hi,
Thank you for your information. We are not looking for any specific feature. We
want to make sure if ActiveMQ Artemis is stable and robust enough for
migration. As your guys mentioned on official website, once Artemis reaches a
sufficient level, it will become ActiveMQ 6. Thus, do you have
Check out the roadmap [1]. A *lot* of work has been done since this topic
was last discussed on the mailing list. At this point I think most, if not
all, of the features which aren't yet implemented are probably unnecessary.
As Gary mentioned, please elaborate on what features you still need (if
a
Hi Weihao Li,
Can you expand on the features that you require that are missing?
We are still committed to making migration as easy as possible.
Kind regards,
gary
On Wed, 26 Aug 2020 at 15:23, Weihao Li wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Sorry if this is not the correct mailing list.
>
> We are loyal Active MQ u
