Dirk,
You are my hero, thank you! I will certainly take a look at your slides at
the office tomorrow, but the simple confirmation that 1000/sec should be
manageable via the JDBC option means I get to make our operations guy happy
tomorrow. They are already pretty good at setting up HA mysql, as l
D'OH!!!
The hyperlink has vanished for the slides, look here:
fusesource.com/collateral/download/74/
On Jan 4, 2011, at 8:51 PM, Dirk Fröhner wrote:
> Hi wezhall,
>
> yes, when you want to have an HA JMS node, you will need to chose the "real"
> architecture: Master and slave using a shared
Hi wezhall,
yes, when you want to have an HA JMS node, you will need to chose the "real"
architecture: Master and slave using a shared persistence layer in two ways:
a) as mutex to determine which process is master and which process is slave and
b) for sharing the storage for the persistent queue
