Re: [Apache.NMS.ActiveMQ]using FailoverTransport

2009-02-04 Thread mkeenan
semog wrote: > > Thanks for the info on your test results. That's an important note > about the failover uri syntax. I will use that info as I look into a > On the subject of uri syntax, I tried the following: "activemq:failover:(tcp://localhost:61616,tcp://localhost:61626,tcp://localhost:6

Re: [Apache.NMS.ActiveMQ]using FailoverTransport

2009-02-02 Thread Jim Gomes
Thanks for the info on your test results. That's an important note about the failover uri syntax. I will use that info as I look into a separate report that the failover uri parsing is failing on Mono. On 1/31/09, wangchao wrote: > > Thank you for your suggestion,semog. > I tested the code

Re: [Apache.NMS.ActiveMQ]using FailoverTransport

2009-01-31 Thread wangchao
Thank you for your suggestion,semog. I tested the code again and found it's a wrong url.When I added the brackets arround the broker uri list(activemq:failover:(tcp://localhost:61616)),it ran correctly as described in the official document. If there's no broker running,the client applicati

Re: [Apache.NMS.ActiveMQ]using FailoverTransport

2009-01-30 Thread semog
I haven't tested out the failover code yet, but I've been told that it is working. I would suggest taking out the failover: specifier in your connection string to see if a normal connection works. Then work up to using failover. wangchao wrote: > > Hello everyone: > I encountered a proble