Re: Memory leak when consuming frequently

Amazon MQ is based on ActiveMQ 5.x, but if you're only seeing this issue on Amazon MQ and not on your instances of ActiveMQ then I recommend you get in touch with Amazon support. Justin On Thu, Mar 26, 2020 at 8:44 AM Kmahesh045 wrote: > Hi, > I am publishing 1000 messages per second and the o

Re: memory leak

Hi, >From the side, it does look like pending messages accumulated in memory because of a slow or blocked subscriber. Since you have heap dump, you should look at this specific TopicSubscription object just to make sure you don't have actually a consumer subscribed to some of your topics, but not

Re: Memory leak with apache artemis 2.1.0

the issue is solved in 2.2.0 thanks a lot : -- View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Memory-leak-with-apache-artemis-2-1-0-tp4728863p4729051.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list

Re: Memory leak with apache artemis 2.1.0

rick.reg...@edf.fr > Tel : 01.78.66.60.79 > Fax : 01.78.66.93.47 > > > -Message d'origine- > De : clebert.suco...@gmail.com [mailto:clebert.suco...@gmail.com] > Envoyé : mardi 25 juillet 2017 20:29 > À : users@activemq.apache.org > Objet : Re: Memory leak with apache

RE: Memory leak with apache artemis 2.1.0

d'origine- De : clebert.suco...@gmail.com [mailto:clebert.suco...@gmail.com] Envoyé : mardi 25 juillet 2017 20:29 À : users@activemq.apache.org Objet : Re: Memory leak with apache artemis 2.1.0 Just sent the RC for 2.2.0.. I would appreciate if you could evaluate the release according

Re: Memory leak with apache artemis 2.1.0

Just sent the RC for 2.2.0.. I would appreciate if you could evaluate the release accordingly to that vote thread on the dev list. On Tue, Jul 25, 2017 at 8:47 AM, Clebert Suconic wrote: > I am sending the vote thread today for 2.2.0 with that fix. > > Can you try it then. Expect it within 11:00

Re: Memory leak with apache artemis 2.1.0

I am sending the vote thread today for 2.2.0 with that fix. Can you try it then. Expect it within 11:00 EST today. On Tue, Jul 25, 2017 at 5:35 AM Helge Waastad wrote: > Hi, > Try 2.2.0 snapshot. > A few mem issues has been resolved since 2.1.0. > > /hw > > Sendt fra min iPhone > > > Den 25. ju

Re: Memory leak with apache artemis 2.1.0

Hi, Try 2.2.0 snapshot. A few mem issues has been resolved since 2.1.0. /hw Sendt fra min iPhone > Den 25. jul. 2017 kl. 11.06 skrev Deomisr : > > Hi, > > With my broker Mqtt configuration, it seems a memory leak appears after 3 > days. > Indeed the memory increase but each full GC and GC not

Re: Memory leak in JDBC Message Store

did you try running without the journal? ie: replace ... with: On 15 May 2015 at 09:17, Denary wrote: > Hello. Recently I've faced with weird problem, actually I'm not sure if it's > a bug or misconfiguration or something else. But since my broker has > "almost" def

Re: Memory Leak problem after upgrade from 5.5.1 to 5.10

Bellow is result from Eclipse Memory Analyzer *Problem Suspect 1* One instance of "com.sun.jmx.mbeanserver.JmxMBeanServer" loaded by "" occupies 182,127,056 (57.45%) bytes. The instance is referenced by org.apache.activemq.broker.jmx.ManagementContext @ 0xf142bc0 , loaded by "java.net.URLClassLoad

Re: Memory Leak problem after upgrade from 5.5.1 to 5.10

It's hard to know what's causing the problem from the description. Can you perform java memory-leak diagnosis? Capturing a heap dump after running for a while, or perhaps two with a few hours between them, and then opening in your favorite heap-dump analysis tool. Yourkit is a good one for findi

Re: Memory Leak in Active MQ 5.9.0?

Could there be clients creating temporary destinations and never deleting them? Temporary destinations are automatically removed on shutdown of the session which created them (or the connection of that session). Before then, they will live indefinitely unless the delete() method is explicitly cal

Re: Memory leak??

I think we will need to see the client code to see if there's anything obviously wrong with the use of Temp Destinations On 29 Apr 2013, at 21:21, SledgeHammer wrote: > Hmm... I switched the response queue to be a "permanent" queue and it looks > like it doesn't have the same memory leak issue.

Re: Memory leak??

Hmm... I switched the response queue to be a "permanent" queue and it looks like it doesn't have the same memory leak issue. -- View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Memory-leak-tp4666300p4666412.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.co

Re: Memory leak??

I am using persistent messages. I have not mucked with any of the backing or memory options, so thats all stock. The way I have this working right now is (on the consumer side): Consumer creates IMessageConsumer on ActiveMQ.Advisory.Queue Consumer uses Listener += method when I get a Queue Add a

Re: Memory leak??

persistent, or non persistent messages? you want to be careful using non-persistent messages and disabling producer flow control. also temporary destinations don't provide a backing store and everything is in memory. this means even for persistent messages you can run oom with PFC off. you can use

Re: Memory leak??

Hi Christian, here is my complete config. Its pretty standard. FYI: I tried bumping up the to 128 mb, and I still get the error. I have producer flow control disabled as you can see. How do I "check using jmx" in a Windows environ

Re: Memory leak??

you must have some other destinations that have messages are using broker memory. check using jmx. what are your settings for destination and system memory? http://activemq.apache.org/producer-flow-control.html On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 9:38 AM, SledgeHammer wrote: > Any advice on this issue guys

Re: Memory leak??

Any advice on this issue guys? -- View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Memory-leak-tp4666300p4666394.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: [Memory leak ] The web application appears to have started a thread.

I see (lines similar to) the following in my log, everytime, I shutdown TomEE. Am I concerned? Even though it says 'SEVERE', it also says, 'very likely to create a memory leak'. I don't see these threads any longer after I stop TomEE and I don't see these threads when I restart TomEE. I get brand n

Re: [Memory leak ] The web application appears to have started a thread.

Thanks Howard, Unfortunately, I can´t stop the thread. Anyone have any suggestions? On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 8:24 PM, Howard W. Smith, Jr. < smithh032...@gmail.com> wrote: > About a month ago, I started using ActiveMQ (v5.8.0) that is bundled with > TomEE (v1.6.0), and i noticed that in the log

Re: [Memory leak ] The web application appears to have started a thread.

About a month ago, I started using ActiveMQ (v5.8.0) that is bundled with TomEE (v1.6.0), and i noticed that in the log too, when I stopped TomEE (to deploy new version of WAR file). so, I searched google, and found the following, http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Old-issue-Memory-leak-after-

Re: [Memory leak ] The web application appears to have started a thread.

How are you deploying ActiveMQ? The ActiveMQ is deployed as stand alone server. I execute the activemq.sh. The consumers are in the web application, they are initialized inside of the ServletContextListener (contextInitialized), when I load the Spring Context. How is it being gracefully shutdown?

Re: [Memory leak ] The web application appears to have started a thread.

How are you deploying ActiveMQ? How is it being gracefully shutdown? On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 2:22 PM, Leonardo Torres wrote: > Hi guys, > > I´m using AMQ 5.7.0 with Spring 3.0.1 and tomcat 7.0.19 as servlet > container. So, when my application starts, it´s ok, but when the tomcat > stop, I see

Re: Memory Leak In TransportConnector

Brilliant! Many thanks Gary - v5.5.0 fixed the issue. If you have time, I'd be very interested to read the JIRA should you find it. Great work, and thanks for the response. -- View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Memory-Leak-In-TransportConnector-tp3635116p3637273

Re: Memory Leak In TransportConnector

that sounds familiar, as in an issue that has been resolved, but I can't quickly find a corresponding jira to show that it is fixed. It sounds like something that could be easily reproducible in a test setup. Maybe try and replicate and then try with 5.5. If the problem persists with 5.5, and ther

Re: Memory leak using Ajax

On Feb 1, 2011, at 4:29 AM, stratio wrote: > > Hello, i'm using an ActiveMQ Ajax client wich reads a message from a topic > and do nothing, just receive the message. If i run it with firefox I have a > tremendous amount of memory usage and i don't know why cause in other > browsers it doesn't hap

Re: memory leak problem with ActiveMQ 5.1

Part of my problem I found was that I wrapped the parts of the JMS library that I needed into my own library. For each endpoint I was creating a producer AND consumer regardless if I need both or not. This was leading to the producer/consumer eating up memory by creating objects that I did not nee

Re: memory leak problem with ActiveMQ 5.1

Maybe some of the following options are relevant http://activemq.apache.org/javalangoutofmemory.html#java.lang.OutOfMemory-SpoolingMessagestoDisk On 28 June 2010 08:37, PatrickVB wrote: > > Hi, > > I know this thread is quite old. I'm getting the same error. > The JVM which is sending message to

Re: memory leak problem with ActiveMQ 5.1

Hi, I know this thread is quite old. I'm getting the same error. The JVM which is sending message to the broker is getting an OOM. I'm using 5.3.1. For message sending I use stream message. Regards Patrick elihusmails wrote: > > I am finally getting the chance to continue testing this and

Re: Memory leak while running a network of brokers?

Hi Seb, I tried out the 5.3.1-SNAPSHOT from Jan 28 (which is the latest I could just download) and the behavior is the same, so if I will not get further replay to this thread I will open a bug in the issue tracker. Thanks, Mark Sebastian Rodriguez-2 wrote: > > Hi Mark, > There is a memory lea

Re: Memory leak while running a network of brokers?

Hi Mark, There is a memory leak solved in the 5.3.1 branch ( AMQ-2448 ) that occurs when using network of brokers. It doesn't seem it's exactly your test case, as the two brokers are apparently up during your test. Maybe you give a try to the 5.3.

Re: memory leak problem with ActiveMQ 5.1

It is probably best to open a jira issue and submit a Junit test case of your client that demonstrates the out of memory error. 2008/11/19 Elihu Smails <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > I am finally getting the chance to continue testing this and am still > getting OutOfMemory errors on the JVM that is sendi

Re: memory leak problem with ActiveMQ 5.1

I am finally getting the chance to continue testing this and am still getting OutOfMemory errors on the JVM that is sending messages to the ActiveMQ server. I have set the policy to on the ActiveMQ server using the latest code in the trunk. Anyone have any more ideas on how to prevent these OutO

Re: memory leak problem with ActiveMQ 5.1

2008/10/14 Mark Webb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > nevermind, I thought this was a source code change It was - on trunk -- James --- http://macstrac.blogspot.com/ Open Source Integration http://fusesource.com/

Re: memory leak problem with ActiveMQ 5.1

nevermind, I thought this was a source code change On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 1:52 PM, Mark Webb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > on what branch did you check this in on? I just performed an update on the > trunk and see no changes. > > > > > On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 10:36 AM, James Strachan <[EMAIL

Re: memory leak problem with ActiveMQ 5.1

on what branch did you check this in on? I just performed an update on the trunk and see no changes. On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 10:36 AM, James Strachan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote: > 2008/10/14 Mark Webb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > You would be my new best friend if you did :) > > Done! :) > > -- > J

Re: memory leak problem with ActiveMQ 5.1

2008/10/14 Mark Webb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > You would be my new best friend if you did :) Done! :) -- James --- http://macstrac.blogspot.com/ Open Source Integration http://fusesource.com/

Re: memory leak problem with ActiveMQ 5.1

You would be my new best friend if you did :) In my opinion, it seems to me like this should be turned off by default and then the option to turn it on is available. I am hitting OutOfMemory errors after 10,000 messages, which takes about an hour for me. On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 10:16 AM, James

Re: memory leak problem with ActiveMQ 5.1

2008/10/10 Rob Davies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > That's not a a memory leak you're seeing - that's the wacky Retroactive > Consumer functionality - see > http://activemq.apache.org/retroactive-consumer.html > The default policy is FixedSizeSubscrptionRecoveryPolicy - and the default > cache size for e

Re: memory leak problem with ActiveMQ 5.1

So I would see this increase in memory on the JMS sender? This seems a little strange. I have tried ActiveMQ 5.2 and see the same problem on the sending client application. On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 2:39 AM, Rob Davies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > That's not a a memory leak you're seeing - tha

Re: memory leak problem with ActiveMQ 5.1

That's not a a memory leak you're seeing - that's the wacky Retroactive Consumer functionality - see http://activemq.apache.org/retroactive-consumer.html The default policy is FixedSizeSubscrptionRecoveryPolicy - and the default cache size for each topic in 5.1 is about 6mb. I'd suggest conf

Re: Memory leak in broker when subscribing to a topic using TCP connector + noLocal?

Yes please - submit the test case - and when attaching it to the jira issue - click the grant to apache check box thanks, Rob On 7 Oct 2008, at 22:36, xnbuslynsobm wrote: Hiram Chirino wrote: I opened issue https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-1889 and have committed a fix. Tha

Re: Memory leak in broker when subscribing to a topic using TCP connector + noLocal?

Hiram Chirino wrote: > > I opened issue https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-1889 > and have committed a fix. Thanks for the report.. Still looking > forward for your test case contribution so that the test suite can > catch this error in the future. > Sorry for the late reply. Sure,

Re: Memory leak in broker when subscribing to a topic using TCP connector + noLocal?

Hello all, I don't know if it is the same case but even if you remove the listener and set local to false, you get a java.lang.OutOfMemoryError: Java heap space Here is the trace Memory Usage:0Memory Percent:0Send count:0Memory: 5177344 Memory Usage:0Memory Perce

Re: Memory leak in broker when subscribing to a topic using TCP connector + noLocal?

I opened issue https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-1889 and have committed a fix. Thanks for the report.. Still looking forward for your test case contribution so that the test suite can catch this error in the future. On Fri, Aug 15, 2008 at 8:35 AM, Hiram Chirino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> w

Re: Memory leak in broker when subscribing to a topic using TCP connector + noLocal?

I just tried out your attached test case and yeah it looks like a problem. Could you shoot us back an email letting us know that you are willing to contribute the test case to the ASF under the ASL 2.0 license so we can include parts of it in test suite? On Mon, Aug 4, 2008 at 6:26 PM, Pieper, Aa

Re: Memory leak in broker when subscribing to a topic using TCP connector + noLocal?

Do you get the same sort of behavior if you point your pub/sub client to an external broker? Joe www.ttmsolutions.com Aaron Pieper wrote: > > I'm encountering what appears to be a memory leak in the BrokerService. > The symptom is that the BrokerService's memory usage increases with each > me

Re: Memory Leak

I noted the leak when running a 5.1 SNAPSHOT against JDK 1.5.0_06-b05 for Windows XP Pro SP2. Joe rajdavies wrote: > > > On 27 Mar 2008, at 04:18, Sachindra Nath wrote: > >> This bug is supposed to have been fixed in SUN VM 1.5.0_12. >> http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do;jsessionid

Re: Memory Leak

On 27 Mar 2008, at 04:18, Sachindra Nath wrote: This bug is supposed to have been fixed in SUN VM 1.5.0_12. http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do;jsessionid=ee6ec97669ab91923bde6c d8c041?bug_id=6460501 Would we still expect the ActiveMQ5.0 + Sun JDK 1.5.0_12 memory leak? Possibly - cou

RE: Memory Leak

This bug is supposed to have been fixed in SUN VM 1.5.0_12. http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do;jsessionid=ee6ec97669ab91923bde6c d8c041?bug_id=6460501 Would we still expect the ActiveMQ5.0 + Sun JDK 1.5.0_12 memory leak? -Original Message- From: ttmdev [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Memory Leak?

What amq version jdk and os? Also is it the client or the broker that gets the OOM? On Dec 7, 2007 12:19 PM, Alan Williamson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > All, > > We are using ActiveMQ v5, and have found an interesting situation with > our sending process. > > We have just confirmed, that if we t

Re: Memory Leak Using Temporary Queues

Running a profiler should help decifer where the memory leak is. I'm wondering if its the advisory issue ... http://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-1255 On 6/20/07, mpont <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hello All, I am grappling with what appears to be memory leaks while creating and destr