se i have a distributed
> filesystem underneath so i have to play with activemq so as to achieve it.
> That's what i want to do.
>
>> Date: Mon, 27 Dec 2010 17:21:46 +0100
>> Subject: Re: Distributed ActiveMQ Brokers
>> From: de...@nighttale.net
>> To: users@act
yes, in the default case i can't , but in my case i have a distributed
filesystem underneath so i have to play with activemq so as to achieve it.
That's what i want to do.
> Date: Mon, 27 Dec 2010 17:21:46 +0100
> Subject: Re: Distributed ActiveMQ Brokers
> From: de...
ssages are distributed at two or more brokers???
>
>> Date: Mon, 27 Dec 2010 16:50:42 +0100
>> Subject: Re: Distributed ActiveMQ Brokers
>> From: de...@nighttale.net
>> To: users@activemq.apache.org
>>
>> Sure they can. Messages stays on the broker where they
???
> Date: Mon, 27 Dec 2010 16:50:42 +0100
> Subject: Re: Distributed ActiveMQ Brokers
> From: de...@nighttale.net
> To: users@activemq.apache.org
>
> Sure they can. Messages stays on the broker where they are produced
> until consumer arrives, when they are delivered to it.
>
q.apache.org
>> From: dirk.froeh...@email.de
>> Subject: Re: Distributed ActiveMQ Brokers
>> Date: Mon, 27 Dec 2010 15:31:03 +0100
>>
>> Afternoon,
>>
>> As far as I understand your use case, you can set up a so called network of
>> brokers to achieve thi
ot be provided by a network of
brokers .
> To: petrucci_2...@hotmail.com; users@activemq.apache.org
> From: dirk.froeh...@email.de
> Subject: Re: Distributed ActiveMQ Brokers
> Date: Mon, 27 Dec 2010 15:31:03 +0100
>
> Afternoon,
>
> As far as I understand your use cas
Afternoon,
As far as I understand your use case, you can set up a so called network of
brokers to achieve this.
A NWOB is a collection of brokers that know about each other. Destinations are
distributed on the participating nodes as far as they're involved. Clients can
connect to any of the nod
