Re: ActiveMQ Classic Broker and Client Module Issue

2024-10-23 Thread Matt Pavlovich
Yes, ActiveMQ 7.x is a ways off. Having a Java module-friendly client-jar would be interesting though. In the past, we’ve added transition jars to the tree (ie. Activemq-cliekt-jakarta in 5.18.x) and we could do something similar. If you go down the route of making a shaded jar, share your shad

RE: Re: ActiveMQ Classic Broker and Client Module Issue

2024-10-23 Thread Freeman, Christopher
It looks like the OSGi version would be compatible code wise, but it appears that it has not been packaged with a module-info unfortunately. I was attempting to avoid using a shaded jar so that there is less dependency micromanagement, but I may have to look in to that route if we wish to proceed

Re: ActiveMQ Classic Broker and Client Module Issue

2024-10-15 Thread Matt Pavlovich
Hi Christopher- I cannot confirm that ActiveMQ is packaged to align with Java modules. The broker does depend on classes in the client jar, so if you depend on the broker, it will drag the client classes. Since ActiveMQ has been prevalent for so long, moving packages to proper separation will

RE: ActiveMQ Classic Broker and Client Module Issue

2024-10-15 Thread Freeman, Christopher
Sorry I did it twice as I thought I entered in the wrong email! From: Freeman, Christopher Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2024 4:54 PM To: 'users@activemq.apache.org' Subject: ActiveMQ Classic Broker and Client Module Issue Hello all, We are in the process of upgrading our application from Java 8 t