Hi Roger,
I seethanks for answering.
Best regards
Andreas
On Apr 29, 2009, at 8:31 AM, Roger Hoover wrote:
Hi Andreas,
That's an insightful question and there is a good answer, albeit
complicated.
The test is trying to validate the exception handling logic in our
STOMP
client. To pre
Hi Andreas,
That's an insightful question and there is a good answer, albeit
complicated.
The test is trying to validate the exception handling logic in our STOMP
client. To prevent the poison pill problem where the same bad message gets
redelivered over and over in an infinite loop, the logic f
Thanks, Bruce. I'll give this a try.
On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 5:00 PM, Bruce Snyder wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 12:15 AM, Roger Hoover
> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Are queued messages supposed to be delivered in order? I have a simple
> > STOMP Perl script below that shows messages delivered o
Hi Roger,
may be I missed something, but if the application doesn't need the
messages to be in order, why are you testing for it ?
Just wondering
Andreas
On Apr 29, 2009, at 12:15 AM, Roger Hoover wrote:
Hi,
Are queued messages supposed to be delivered in order? I have a
simple
STOMP Perl
On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 12:15 AM, Roger Hoover wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Are queued messages supposed to be delivered in order? I have a simple
> STOMP Perl script below that shows messages delivered out of order. I've
> run it against AMQ 4.1.1 and 5.2.0 in with both persistent and
> non-persistent mess
Hi,
Are queued messages supposed to be delivered in order? I have a simple
STOMP Perl script below that shows messages delivered out of order. I've
run it against AMQ 4.1.1 and 5.2.0 in with both persistent and
non-persistent messages. Note from the message ids and timestamps that the
newer mes
