Re: Questions on upgrading to 5.6.0

2012-05-18 Thread Geoffrey Arnold
Awesome Gary, this was exactly what I was looking for. Thanks again! On May 18, 2012, at 10:29 AM, Gary Tully wrote: > it is totally dependent on your disk size, when a limit is reached, > the next add will block. > The defaults from[1] are: > systemUsage.getMemoryUsage().setLimit(1024 * 1024

Re: Questions on upgrading to 5.6.0

2012-05-18 Thread Gary Tully
it is totally dependent on your disk size, when a limit is reached, the next add will block. The defaults from[1] are: systemUsage.getMemoryUsage().setLimit(1024 * 1024 * 64); // Default 64Meg systemUsage.getTempUsage().setLimit(1024L * 1024 * 1000 * 50); // 50 Gb systemUsage.getStoreUsage

Re: Questions on upgrading to 5.6.0

2012-05-18 Thread Geoffrey Arnold
Many thanks Gary! Do you have recommendations for the storeUsage and tempUsage limits given that our max journal file size is 32mb? How did this work in 5.4.0? On May 18, 2012, at 9:19 AM, Gary Tully wrote: > inline > > On 18 May 2012 05:24, Geoffrey Arnold wrote: >> We are upgrading from A

Re: Questions on upgrading to 5.6.0

2012-05-18 Thread Gary Tully
inline On 18 May 2012 05:24, Geoffrey Arnold wrote: > We are upgrading from AMQ 5.4.0 to 5.6.0, and noticed two issues right off > the bat: > > - The "activemq-all-5.6.0.jar" library is now bundled with the SLF4J Log4J > binding, trumping the JDK 1.4 binding already in our classpath.  As a > w

Questions on upgrading to 5.6.0

2012-05-17 Thread Geoffrey Arnold
We are upgrading from AMQ 5.4.0 to 5.6.0, and noticed two issues right off the bat: - The "activemq-all-5.6.0.jar" library is now bundled with the SLF4J Log4J binding, trumping the JDK 1.4 binding already in our classpath. As a workaround we have switched to using the individual libraries (act