Re: ActiveMQ-CPP Producer Flow Control Question

2012-07-10 Thread JRR
ew this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-CPP-Producer-Flow-Control-Question-tp4653781p4653833.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: ActiveMQ-CPP Producer Flow Control Question

2012-07-09 Thread JRR
83324.n4.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-CPP-Producer-Flow-Control-Question-tp4653781p4653815.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: ActiveMQ-CPP Producer Flow Control Question

2012-07-09 Thread JRR
-=John -- View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-CPP-Producer-Flow-Control-Question-tp4653781p4653814.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: ActiveMQ-CPP Producer Flow Control Question

2012-07-09 Thread Timothy Bish
like me to proceed. Do I post the source, test > information/results, etc. here? > > Thanks > > -=John You should open a new Jira issue and post the relevant info there. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQCPP > > -- > View this message in context: > http://acti

Re: ActiveMQ-CPP Producer Flow Control Question

2012-07-09 Thread JRR
ks -=John -- View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-CPP-Producer-Flow-Control-Question-tp4653781p4653812.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: ActiveMQ-CPP Producer Flow Control Question

2012-07-09 Thread Timothy Bish
Connection Factory constructor instead? > > Thanks in advance, > > -=John You can use dynamic_cast to cast the returned ConnectionFactory instance to an ActiveMQConnectionFactory if you want to configure the factory in code. For the other problem you'd need to create a test case t

Re: ActiveMQ-CPP Producer Flow Control Question

2012-07-09 Thread JRR
View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-CPP-Producer-Flow-Control-Question-tp4653781p4653805.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: ActiveMQ-CPP Producer Flow Control Question

2012-07-06 Thread Timothy Bish
very mode to NON_PERSISTENT > > o. Create the message to send using the session > > o. Use the producer to send the message. > > > We have multiple threads sending in the producer. They all use the same > underlying connection, and create sessions on top of the connection

ActiveMQ-CPP Producer Flow Control Question

2012-07-06 Thread JRR
connection for sending their messages. Thanks in advance for your help, -=John -- View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-CPP-Producer-Flow-Control-Question-tp4653781.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: Producer flow control question

2011-01-04 Thread Dejan Bosanac
View this message in context: > http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Producer-flow-control-question-tp3092808p3173521.html > Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >

Re: Producer flow control question

2011-01-04 Thread maarten.dirkse
The fix for https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-2683 seems to have done the trick. Nightlies now properly do topic PFC. Regards, Maarten -- View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Producer-flow-control-question-tp3092808p3173521.html Sent from the ActiveMQ

Re: Producer flow control question

2010-12-23 Thread maarten.dirkse
Behaviour is the same for 5.4.2 and 5.5-snapshot -- View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Producer-flow-control-question-tp3092808p3162283.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: Producer flow control question

2010-12-23 Thread maarten.dirkse
Pretty sure that this is related to https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-2683 -- View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Producer-flow-control-question-tp3092808p3162218.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: Producer flow control question

2010-12-23 Thread maarten.dirkse
\tConsumed " + count / 1000 + "k messages"); } } } -- View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Producer-flow-control-question-tp3092808p3162214.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: Producer flow control question

2010-12-22 Thread maarten.dirkse
p:explicitQosEnabled="true" >    p:sessionTransacted="false" >    p:sessionAcknowledgeModeName="AUTO_ACKNOWLEDGE" /> > > Thanks, > Maarten > -- View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Producer-flow-control-question-tp3092808p3161458.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: Producer flow control question

2010-12-20 Thread maarten.dirkse
Sorry, should've included that info in the initial mail. Here's how I've setup my connection factories:     And this is the template config: Thanks, Maarten -- View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Producer-flow-control-question-tp30928

Re: Producer flow control question

2010-12-18 Thread Rob Davies
have finished > processing all their messages (and presumably freed up the necessary > resources). > > What am I doing wrong? How do I get component A to start sending again? > > I'm running AMQ 5.4.2, Java 1.6 update 22, and the Spring (2.5.6) > JMSTemplate and

Producer flow control question

2010-12-17 Thread maarten.dirkse
ng. Thanks in advance, Maarten -- View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Producer-flow-control-question-tp3092808p3092808.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.