RE: Problem with network-of-brokers configuration after upgrading to AMQ 5.6.0

2012-05-21 Thread Stephen Vincent
en Vincent Platform R&D Tel: + 1 919 531 7556 stephen.vinc...@sas.com SAS ... THE POWER TO KNOW -Original Message- From: Geoffrey Arnold [mailto:geoffrey.arn...@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, May 21, 2012 3:58 PM To: users@activemq.apache.org Subject: Re: Problem with network-of-brokers confi

Re: Problem with network-of-brokers configuration after upgrading to AMQ 5.6.0

2012-05-21 Thread Geoffrey Arnold
Hey Gary, This all sounds very reasonable to me, but to confirm the issue you referenced was for connectors with duplex enabled, but our connectors do not have duplex enabled (unless it's enabled by default). My guess is that network connector names have to be unique, regardless of whether du

Re: Problem with network-of-brokers configuration after upgrading to AMQ 5.6.0

2012-05-21 Thread Gary Tully
It is a requirement, because on reconnect due to a network partition of two non unique network connectors, if the target broker has not noticed the disconnect, it was possible to get duplicate network connectors created and potential for deadlock. Having them explicitly named allows reliable duplic

Problem with network-of-brokers configuration after upgrading to AMQ 5.6.0

2012-05-20 Thread Geoffrey Arnold
Hello again, We are from AMQ 5.4.0 to 5.6.0, and there appears to be a new uniqueness constraint in network connector names in network-of-brokers configurations. Here's our setup: - N copies of a producer application; each copy of the producer application consists of an embedded broker with 2 n