Re: Potential Bug in Master-Slave with Replicated LevelDB Store

2014-10-30 Thread Tim Bain
er but I guess >> the >> access via JNI may be less optimal than using an embedded Java (or Scala) >> engine. >> >> >> >> >> -- >> View this message in context: >> http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Potential-Bug-in-Master-Slave-with-Replicated-LevelDB-Store-tp4686450p4686583.html >> Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >> > >

Re: Potential Bug in Master-Slave with Replicated LevelDB Store

2014-10-21 Thread Tim Bain
; -- > View this message in context: > http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Potential-Bug-in-Master-Slave-with-Replicated-LevelDB-Store-tp4686450p4686583.html > Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >

Re: Potential Bug in Master-Slave with Replicated LevelDB Store

2014-10-21 Thread uromahn
access via JNI may be less optimal than using an embedded Java (or Scala) engine. -- View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Potential-Bug-in-Master-Slave-with-Replicated-LevelDB-Store-tp4686450p4686583.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at

Re: Potential Bug in Master-Slave with Replicated LevelDB Store

2014-10-21 Thread uromahn
essage in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Potential-Bug-in-Master-Slave-with-Replicated-LevelDB-Store-tp4686450p4686580.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: Potential Bug in Master-Slave with Replicated LevelDB Store

2014-10-21 Thread uromahn
that and "dump" the messages there rather than in the log file. I will run some more tests by changing the GC to G1 hopefully avoiding a full GC and the demotion of the broker to slave forcing a failover. -- View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Potential-B

Re: Potential Bug in Master-Slave with Replicated LevelDB Store

2014-10-20 Thread Tim Bain
going on, but it appears that something is > wrong with the replicated LevelDB which needs more investigation. > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Potential-Bug-in-Master-Slave-with-Replicated-LevelDB-Store-tp4686450p4686548.html > Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >

Re: Potential Bug in Master-Slave with Replicated LevelDB Store

2014-10-20 Thread uromahn
oing on, but it appears that something is wrong with the replicated LevelDB which needs more investigation. -- View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Potential-Bug-in-Master-Slave-with-Replicated-LevelDB-Store-tp4686450p4686548.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - User maili

Re: Potential Bug in Master-Slave with Replicated LevelDB Store

2014-10-17 Thread Tim Bain
is that it is likely to > be > a network problem and not an issue within ActiveMQ. > > I will follow-up in case the issue shows up again. > > Until then, sorry for potentially raising a false alarm. > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://activemq.2

Re: Potential Bug in Master-Slave with Replicated LevelDB Store

2014-10-17 Thread uromahn
raising a false alarm. -- View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Potential-Bug-in-Master-Slave-with-Replicated-LevelDB-Store-tp4686450p4686492.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: Potential Bug in Master-Slave with Replicated LevelDB Store

2014-10-17 Thread uromahn
my original post for brevity) -- View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Potential-Bug-in-Master-Slave-with-Replicated-LevelDB-Store-tp4686450p4686488.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: Potential Bug in Master-Slave with Replicated LevelDB Store

2014-10-16 Thread Tim Bain
en within 10 > seconds because my message listener has an internal timeout of 10 seconds. > I have double and triple-checked the configuration and everything looks ok. > Also, this doesn't happen in case both producer and consumer connect to the > same cluster, e.g. amq1 or amq4. So, the individual cluster seem to work. > The issue only seem to appear when transmitting messages between clusters > in > a network of broker. > > Any idea if this is a bug or just a SUE (stupid user error). :) > > -Uli > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Potential-Bug-in-Master-Slave-with-Replicated-LevelDB-Store-tp4686450.html > Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >

Potential Bug in Master-Slave with Replicated LevelDB Store

2014-10-16 Thread uromahn
bug or just a SUE (stupid user error). :) -Uli -- View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Potential-Bug-in-Master-Slave-with-Replicated-LevelDB-Store-tp4686450.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.