Re: Issues with KahaDB persistence in ActiveMQ 5.6.0 (IndexOutOfBoundsException, IllegalStateException)

2012-10-22 Thread Claus Ibsen
ne should be deprecated. >> >> >> >> -- >> View this message in context: >> http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Issues-with-KahaDB-persistence-in-ActiveMQ-5-6-0-IndexOutOfBoundsException-IllegalStateException-tp4658031p4658040.html >> Sent from the Active

Re: Issues with KahaDB persistence in ActiveMQ 5.6.0 (IndexOutOfBoundsException, IllegalStateException)

2012-10-22 Thread Gary Tully
gt; > > -- > View this message in context: > http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Issues-with-KahaDB-persistence-in-ActiveMQ-5-6-0-IndexOutOfBoundsException-IllegalStateException-tp4658031p4658040.html > Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- http://redhat.com http://blog.garytully.com

Re: Issues with KahaDB persistence in ActiveMQ 5.6.0 (IndexOutOfBoundsException, IllegalStateException)

2012-10-22 Thread Pauli Kaila
instead of Kaha)? The fact that there are two so similarly named persistence adapters is quite confusing. Perhaps other one should be deprecated. -- View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Issues-with-KahaDB-persistence-in-ActiveMQ-5-6-0-IndexOutOfBoundsException

Re: Issues with KahaDB persistence in ActiveMQ 5.6.0 (IndexOutOfBoundsException, IllegalStateException)

2012-10-22 Thread Gary Tully
.6.0] > at > org.apache.activemq.broker.TransportConnection$1.onCommand(TransportConnection.java:150) > ~[activemq-core-5.6.0.jar:5.6.0] > at > org.apache.activemq.transport.ResponseCorrelator.onCommand(ResponseCorrelator.java:116) > ~[activemq-core-5.6.0.jar:5.6.

Issues with KahaDB persistence in ActiveMQ 5.6.0 (IndexOutOfBoundsException, IllegalStateException)

2012-10-22 Thread Pauli Kaila
://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Issues-with-KahaDB-persistence-in-ActiveMQ-5-6-0-IndexOutOfBoundsException-IllegalStateException-tp4658031.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: Guaranteed message persistence in ActiveMQ?

2011-02-23 Thread Gary Tully
Guaranteed reliability is the default behavior (part of the jms contract). A send transaction will allow you to batch messages, taking the fsync hit at the end of the transaction rather than on each send. On 22 February 2011 22:33, Paul Pearcy wrote: > Hello, >  What is the correct/best way to ac

Guaranteed message persistence in ActiveMQ?

2011-02-22 Thread Paul Pearcy
Hello, What is the correct/best way to achieve crash proof durability of messages with ActiveMQ? I'd like to ensure that my persistent messages have been fsynced to disk and I know that in the case of a broker power failure, the message will be there when the server comes back up. Do I need to

Re: Persistence in ActiveMQ

2007-12-06 Thread James Strachan
BTW in a JMS client, persistence is on by default. On 06/12/2007, Bruce Snyder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Dec 5, 2007 10:25 AM, mule1 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Hello, > > > > I am having the same problem. I am not able to figure out how in activemq 5, > > I can persist all messages -

Re: Persistence in ActiveMQ

2007-12-05 Thread Bruce Snyder
On Dec 5, 2007 10:25 AM, mule1 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hello, > > I am having the same problem. I am not able to figure out how in activemq 5, > I can persist all messages - I tried setting persistent="true" on the broker > in activemq.xml The persistent flag is true by default, but you als

Re: Persistence in ActiveMQ

2007-12-05 Thread mule1
ssage in context: http://www.nabble.com/Persistence-in-ActiveMQ-tf4689558s2354.html#a14176273 Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Persistence in ActiveMQ

2007-10-25 Thread navneek
,,, -Navneeth. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Persistence-in-ActiveMQ-tf4689558s2354.html#a13403066 Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.