Thanks!
On Sun, Nov 29, 2015 at 5:29 AM, Christopher Shannon <
christopher.l.shan...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I have merged this into master so it will go into 5.13.0 on Monday. I will
> let Jenkins run our builds today to catch any problems but I don't expect
> any issues.
>
> On Sat, Nov 28, 2015 a
I have merged this into master so it will go into 5.13.0 on Monday. I will
let Jenkins run our builds today to catch any problems but I don't expect
any issues.
On Sat, Nov 28, 2015 at 2:25 AM, Claus Ibsen wrote:
> Yeah I agree.
>
> I just wonder if that loop was using equals and not comparing
Yeah I agree.
I just wonder if that loop was using equals and not comparing just the
message id, maybe there was a purpose of the old code. But a git blame
can maybe tell us more.
On Sat, Nov 28, 2015 at 5:34 AM, David Sitsky wrote:
> Done: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-6066
>
> If y
Done: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-6066
If you can incorporate the patch in for 5.13.0 I'd be very grateful.. as it
is a pain for us to not use an official release. Also I believe this is a
really important performance regression that we'd want to stomp out quickly
for ActiveMQ..
Ma
Claus is right, open up a Jira and I or someone else can take a look at
this. I don't know if there will be enough time to put this in before
5.13.0 because I plan on starting the release Monday for that and I'd want
to make sure all the tests run and there would be no unintended issues by
making
Hi
Well spotted. I think a good idea is to log a JIRA ticket about this
so its not forgotten and so the AMQ team can look at it and get it
into the next release.
On Fri, Nov 27, 2015 at 2:39 AM, David Sitsky wrote:
> FWIW I changed the contains method as follows:
>
> @Override
> public boolean c
FWIW I changed the contains method as follows:
@Override
public boolean contains(MessageReference message) {
if (message != null) {
return map.containsKey(message.getMessageId());
}
return false;
}
I got a speedup for my test taking 29 minutes from 41 minutes. Can we get
this
Hi,
I have updated my application from ActiveMQ 5.3 to 5.11.1 and have noticed
a performance degregation issue. Running a number of jstacks I can see the
broker is often stuck here:
"Queue:master-items" Id=122 RUNNABLE
at
org.apache.activemq.broker.region.cursors.OrderedPendingList.contains(Orde