t;> Queue I
>>> have response times of 4-7 seconds
>>> This is not good.
>>> Here is an extract of the AMQ log file:
>>> 2009-01-22 18:08:11,229 [ueue://tracking] INFO
>>> kaha.impl.index.hash.HashIndex - Resize hash bins
>>> que
this and it seems to be the only
> way of NOT getting an out of memory error.
> Does it make sense to change the indexkeysize or the indexpagesize in the
> store? Would this maybe gice additional constant performance?
>
> Btw:
> I'm using AMQ 5.2
>
> Thanks and best
ns
>> queue-data_queue#3a#2f#2ftracking from 4096 to 8192
>> 2009-01-22 18:18:12,564 [ueue://tracking] INFO
>> kaha.impl.index.hash.HashIndex - Resize hash bins
>> queue-data_queue#3a#2f#2ftracking from 8192 to 16384
>>
>> Well, the main question is now:
>> 1.
size hash bins
> queue-data_queue#3a#2f#2ftracking from 8192 to 16384
>
> Well, the main question is now:
> 1. Why is the queue getting slower when there are a lot of messages inside?
> 2. How can I change the size of the data-queue-data-959 files?
> Would it make sense to have a few
data-queue-data-959 files?
Would it make sense to have a few big of those files instead of a lot of
small one?
3. What is this file for: hash-index-queue-data_queue#3a#2f#2ftracking
Thanks and regards
Jörg
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Performance-in-relation-to-queue-size
ld it be better to have one queue big file with 30GB of size
>> instead of
>> hundreds of files having 1 MB?
>>
>> The key index ist persistent. I tested this and it seems to be the
>> only way
>> of NOT getting an out of memory error.
>> Does it make sense to
ce-in-relation-to-queue-size-tp21601585p21601585.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
only way
> of NOT getting an out of memory error.
> Does it make sense to change the indexkeysize or the indexpagesize in the
> store? Would this maybe gice additional constant performance?
>
> Btw:
> I'm using AMQ 5.2
>
> Thanks and best regards
>
> Jörg
>
change the indexkeysize or the indexpagesize in the
store? Would this maybe gice additional constant performance?
Btw:
I'm using AMQ 5.2
Thanks and best regards
Jörg
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Performance-in-relation-to-queue-size-tp21601585p21601585.html