Re: Performance in 5.8.0 vs 5.2.0

2013-03-27 Thread Gary Tully
I think this is a change in the persistence adapter, we now sync by default on every send, the jms durability guarantee. Use to get the same behaviour as 5.2. I think 5.2 would only sync on a transaction boundary. On 27 March 2013 09:43, Martin Fredriksson wrote: > I recently upgraded our Activ

Re: Performance in 5.8.0 vs 5.2.0

2013-03-27 Thread Paul Gale
Are you using the same ActiveMQ.xml with each version? Can you post the activemq.xml (s) you're using? Thanks, Paul On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 5:43 AM, Martin Fredriksson < ghart.fredriks...@gmail.com> wrote: > I recently upgraded our ActiveMQ version from 5.2.0 to 5.8.0 and after that > we experie

Performance in 5.8.0 vs 5.2.0

2013-03-27 Thread Martin Fredriksson
I recently upgraded our ActiveMQ version from 5.2.0 to 5.8.0 and after that we experience a drop in performance. In particular when sending persisted messages to a queue. I have used Apache JMeter to get some benchmark values with a JMS Publisher, sending 5000 text messages to a queue. With Active