Re: Performance degrade issue using ActiveMQ scheduler

2015-05-27 Thread Kevin Burton
> - the fact that the performance degradation was for all ActiveMQ and not > only for the "scheduled" queue The *basic* ActiveMQ setup, with no features enabled, is somewhat fast and non-complicated. When you start enabling features, like advisories, scheduling, etc. it becomes more complicated.

Re: Performance degrade issue using ActiveMQ scheduler

2015-05-27 Thread contezero74
erformance-degrade-issue-using-ActiveMQ-scheduler-tp4696754p4696951.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: Performance degrade issue using ActiveMQ scheduler

2015-05-27 Thread contezero74
to their limit. But for sure the system has to return to work correctly after the use of the scheduled-area stops. P.S. thanks, also for all the hint related to VisualVM cheers, Eros -- View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Performance-degrade-issue-using-Active

Re: Performance degrade issue using ActiveMQ scheduler

2015-05-25 Thread Kevin Burton
eon(R) CPU E5-2680 v3 @ 2.50GHz' >- Ram: 31744MB > > > cheers and thanks in advance for your help, > Eros > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Performance-degrade-issue-using-ActiveMQ-scheduler-tp4696754.htm

Re: Performance degrade issue using ActiveMQ scheduler

2015-05-25 Thread Tim Bain
nd if it turns out the design itself can't accommodate this volume, then hopefully redesigning the algorithm won't be hard. > -- > View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Performance-degrade-issue-using-ActiveMQ-scheduler-tp4696754p4696899.html > Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: Performance degrade issue using ActiveMQ scheduler

2015-05-25 Thread contezero74
it wasn't design for a so massive use of the scheduled-area cheers, Eros -- View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Performance-degrade-issue-using-ActiveMQ-scheduler-tp4696754p4696899.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: Performance degrade issue using ActiveMQ scheduler

2015-05-22 Thread Tim Bain
't know if I express well > the concept... I hope. > > In any case I'll maintain this topic updated with all our finding. > > cheers, > Eros > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Performance-degrade-issue-using-ActiveMQ-scheduler-tp4696754p4696854.html > Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >

Re: Performance degrade issue using ActiveMQ scheduler

2015-05-22 Thread contezero74
q.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Performance-degrade-issue-using-ActiveMQ-scheduler-tp4696754p4696854.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: Performance degrade issue using ActiveMQ scheduler

2015-05-21 Thread Tim Bain
GC seems works > fine > too= > * Hardware: virtualized based on VMWare: >- CPUs: 24 vCPUs mapped on 'Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2680 v3 @ 2.50GHz' >- Ram: 31744MB > > > cheers and thanks in advance for your help, > Eros > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Performance-degrade-issue-using-ActiveMQ-scheduler-tp4696754.html > Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >

Performance degrade issue using ActiveMQ scheduler

2015-05-21 Thread contezero74
n 'Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2680 v3 @ 2.50GHz' - Ram: 31744MB cheers and thanks in advance for your help, Eros -- View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Performance-degrade-issue-using-ActiveMQ-scheduler-tp4696754.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mai