I am not comparing the throughput of non-persistent messages with persistent
messages that have asyncSend. I am just pointing out that your throughput
for sending persistent messages will improve if you send the persistent
messages with asyncSend. Question is, what is the risk-level of sending
per
Much appreciated Joe. Let me get this straight: higher throughput with
persistent messaging + asyncSend vs. non-persistent messaging? It wouldn't
be the same throughput?
Joe Fernandez wrote:
>
> Non-persistent messages are, by default, sent asynchronously (a.k.a., fire
> and forget).
>
> Ye
Non-persistent messages are, by default, sent asynchronously (a.k.a., fire
and forget).
Yes, if you send persistent messages with asyncSend, you will realize a nice
boost in throughput.
Joe
http://www.ttmsolutions.com
jongraf wrote:
>
> Two questions:
> 1) Is asyncSend set to true by defaul
Two questions:
1) Is asyncSend set to true by default if I am using non-persistent
messaging? The line of code where this is determined is ActiveMQSession
line 1670, 1680:
if (sendTimeout <= 0 && !msg.isResponseRequired() &&
!connection.isAlwaysSyncSend() && (!msg.isPersistent() ||
