Re: [Spam: 5.0] Non-Persistent Topic not getting messages

On 2/23/07, GaryG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: When you say "client" are you talking about the client connection should automatically send keep-alive pings, or is this something our code has to do manually? Sorry I mean that the internals of the ActiveMQ JMS Client should do the keep-alive stuff

Re: [Spam: 5.0] Non-Persistent Topic not getting messages

if a JMS connection isn't doing much > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Non-Persistent-Topic-not-getting-messages-tf3264593s2354.html#a9122086 Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: Non-Persistent Topic not getting messages

On 2/21/07, GaryG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I have not looked at the JMX stats. For whatever reason, I haven't been able to connect remotely to the broker. Aside from that...Why would a broker kill clients due to inactivity? Some OSes/platforms don't detect a socket death for hours or days;

Re: Non-Persistent Topic not getting messages

to your situation. Anyway, you may want to look into the > usageManager settings in the broker configuration to set the limit > higher. A 20MiB default seems weird. I didn't think that there was a > default. > > -- > Christopher G. Stach II > > > -- View this

Re: Non-Persistent Topic not getting messages

GaryG wrote: > AMQ Broker is down again. Same situation. However, running "jstack" on the > PID doesn't work, it hangs connecting to the process. > > So, I opened up the JMX console, and am providing you some of stats that > looked interesting. > > My main questions regarding this output are: >

Re: Non-Persistent Topic not getting messages

AMQ was started with 512MB. The memory % used says 100%. But this doesn't match the Summary Memory stats. What is this limit? -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Non-Persistent-Topic-not-getting-messages-tf3264593s2354.html#a9093767 Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: Non-Persistent Topic not getting messages

_Gary Christopher G. Stach II wrote: > > > We currently have some issues where queues stop delivering. Can you > generate a stack dump when it's hung? > > -- > Christopher G. Stach II > > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Non-P

Re: Non-Persistent Topic not getting messages

GaryG wrote: > I've got the JMX running. Again the architecture ran fine for about 3 hours, > then all my topics seemed to stop receiving messages. > > So, here's the situation: > > 1) the producers ARE sending messages and there are no exception from AMQ > API when they're sent. > 2) AMQ Brok

Re: Non-Persistent Topic not getting messages

>>> The only difference I can see is that this particular topic is getting >>> ObjectMessage(s), while I've switched the others to "MapMessage(s)". >>> >>> Is there an issue with sending across a large number of ObjectMessage(s) >>> ?? >>&

Re: Non-Persistent Topic not getting messages

gt; ObjectMessage(s), while I've switched the others to "MapMessage(s)". >> >> Is there an issue with sending across a large number of ObjectMessage(s) >> ?? >> It seems that whenever I've used that, after a while messages stop coming >> through. This has h

Re: Non-Persistent Topic not getting messages

d the others to "MapMessage(s)". Is there an issue with sending across a large number of ObjectMessage(s) ?? It seems that whenever I've used that, after a while messages stop coming through. This has happened a number of times now. Thanks, Gary -- View this message in conte

Non-Persistent Topic not getting messages

f times now. Thanks, Gary -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Non-Persistent-Topic-not-getting-messages-tf3264593s2354.html#a9074729 Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.