Re: Non-Persistent Queue

2015-01-22 Thread nelsoncc
Hi, Tks for the answer. It works perfectly Kind Regards -- View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Non-Persistent-Queue-tp4690148p4690270.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: Non-Persistent Queue

2015-01-20 Thread Tim Bain
nsure that messages are expired quickly if no consumer is connected... It's not quite what you're asking for, but it might be close enough to meet your needs. On Jan 20, 2015 7:49 AM, "nelsoncc" wrote: > Hi, > > I'm trying to use a non-persistent queue, but when no

Non-Persistent Queue

2015-01-20 Thread nelsoncc
Hi, I'm trying to use a non-persistent queue, but when no consumer is connected the message stays in activemq. If I connect a consumer after a while the message is delivered. What I want is the same logic of Topic but in a Queue, if no consumer is connected the message is discarded. Th

Prefetch limit is 1? (non-persistent queue, stomp)

2012-11-22 Thread James Green
I have a stomp client connected using pretty much default settings, and I changed it to ack every 100 messages for performance. It gets one message then gives up. Checking the "Active Consumers" for the queue I two entries: A client-id, with a prefetch of 1 A connection-id, with a prefetch of 0

Re: Non-persistent queue, asyncSend

2010-01-15 Thread Joe Fernandez
>> Non-persistent messages are, by default, sent asynchronously (a.k.a., >> fire and forget). >> >> Yes, if you send persistent messages with asyncSend, you will realize a >> nice boost in throughput. >> > > -- View this message in context: http:/

Re: Non-persistent queue, asyncSend

2010-01-15 Thread jongraf
gt; and forget). > > Yes, if you send persistent messages with asyncSend, you will realize a > nice boost in throughput. > -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/Non-persistent-queue%2C-asyncSend-tp27179026p27182943.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: Non-persistent queue, asyncSend

2010-01-15 Thread Joe Fernandez
> is being used. Any recommendations? > > 2) Would I experience faster throughput if I used persistent messaging > with asyncSend instead? > -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/Non-persistent-queue%2C-asyncSend-tp27179026p27182814.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Non-persistent queue, asyncSend

2010-01-15 Thread jongraf
d. Any recommendations? 2) Would I experience faster throughput if I used persistent messaging with asyncSend instead? -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/Non-persistent-queue%2C-asyncSend-tp27179026p27179026.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.