Re: Network of broker question

There are 2 mq servers with same configuration with the exception to the ip address. It looks like the real problem is between the brokers. All memory limit errors are between the brokers and is always between only one of the brokers. What should be my ideal configuration? Any suggestions would be

Re: Network of broker question

So your overall broker memory limit and the individual destination limits are set to the same number. Each destination will think it has 200MB, but it will not (unless there is only one destination). How many destinations do you have? When you run into this issue again, can you check which destinat

Re: Network of broker question

I restarted activemq so everything was reset and currently all of them showing same values: http://activemq.apache.org/schema/core"; brokerName=" pprfdaamq301.ie.id.net" persistent="true" dataDirectory="${activemq.data}">

Re: Network of broker question

DispatchAsync controls how the broker delivers messages to the bridge's network (proxy) consumer. please post the broker configs you're using as well as the destination/subscriptions stats (inflight, dispatchcount, enqueue, dequeue, etc)? On Fri, Jan 4, 2013 at 10:29 AM, Mohit Anchlia wrote: >

Re: Network of broker question

Is it better to set dispathAsync=false on the network of brokers? Currently it looks like this? Name Network TTL

Re: Network of broker question

We have observed this when the link between A & B is slow. Probably a different scenario to the one Mohit is describing though. In our case we had a hub behind a shared ADSL link and several spokes in "production land". We would see messages piling up at random on the spokes until restarts where i

Re: Network of broker question

I checked my message properties and they all have persistent=true in activemq admin console. I also checked that the producers are non-transacted. Is there a way I can look what's inside activemq's memory and what state they are in? I don't have a reproducible test case as I am still trying to fig

Re: Network of broker question

PFC can still affect the network bridge. We should figure out why messages are piling up (unexpectedly??). Do you have a test case that can reproduce this? On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 3:47 PM, Mohit Anchlia wrote: > I think it might be because of this flow control message that I see between > brokers

Re: Network of broker question

I think it might be because of this flow control message that I see between brokers. Here pprfdaa300 is another broker. But why would this happen between brokers though? 2013-01-03 14:44:21,587 | INFO | Usage(default:memory:queue://eventsEndpoint:memory) percentUsage=0%, usage=0, limit=20971520,

Re: Network of broker question

Can you post the config for the two brokers? On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 3:35 PM, Mohit Anchlia wrote: > It's A <> B > > Broker A has 2 messages but no consumers > Broker B has consumers but don't get messages forwarded > > On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 1:33 PM, Christian Posta > wrote: > > > Can you ex

Re: Network of broker question

It's A <> B Broker A has 2 messages but no consumers Broker B has consumers but don't get messages forwarded On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 1:33 PM, Christian Posta wrote: > Can you explain how the brokers are set up? A ---> B ? and which has the > messages and which has the consumer? > > > On Thu,

Re: Network of broker question

Can you explain how the brokers are set up? A ---> B ? and which has the messages and which has the consumer? On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 2:19 PM, Mohit Anchlia wrote: > As I understand that if I have network of brokers than the messages will be > sent to the broker that has active consumers on it. I