On Sat, Aug 22, 2009 at 10:51 AM, gonzus wrote:
>
>
> bsnyder wrote:
>>
>> Request/reply is a versatile style of messaging, but there are no
>> guarantees about the timeliness of the reply. This is where a
>> multi-phased approach would work best when using JMS with HTTP similar to
>> [the workflow
you are one of the authors of the
(upcoming) ActiveMQ in Action book. Delighted to meet you. I am not going to
badger you with any questions, but please do feel free to share any
information you have about its final availability... ;-)
Thanks and best regards.
--
View this message in context:
htt
On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 5:17 PM, gonzus wrote:
>
> Let's say I have a pure JMS-based application, that implements business logic
> by integrating decoupled components through messaging, with all the
> advantages this entails. These applications are triggered by incoming
> payloads (say, files that
t
regards.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Mixing-JMS-and-web-apps-tp25088779p25088779.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
