On 19/11/2007, Matthew Wong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> oops... i'm sorry as i found i've asked an FAQ! :P
>
>
> http://activemq.apache.org/how-should-i-implement-request-response-with-jms.html
You can also use Camel as a Spring Remoting implementation which will
hide all the JMS
; do u think it is okay to rewrite my application to use the ActiveMQ?
>
> how should i handle the request ID?
>
> is it possible for the producer to get that request ID after it send a
> message?
>
> or is there any other strategy?
>
> --
> matt
>
/Message-Producer-and-the-Unique-ID-tf4830682s2354.html#a13820358
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.