RE: EXT :Re: Message Priority In 5.5.0-fuse-00-43

2011-08-03 Thread urciolo
is enabled) structure to hold the messages that are waiting to be dispatched. From: Gary Tully [via ActiveMQ] [mailto:ml-node+3713800-2029387266-139...@n4.nabble.com] Sent: Tuesday, August 02, 2011 5:15 PM To: Urciolo, Kevin J (IS) Subject: Re: EXT :Re: Message Priority In 5.5.0-fuse-00-43 If

Re: EXT :Re: Message Priority In 5.5.0-fuse-00-43

2011-08-02 Thread Gary Tully
cts with the > messages pending dispatch in any way.  I could not see an interaction. > > Kevin > > > From: Urciolo, Kevin J (IS) > Sent: Friday, July 29, 2011 11:58 AM > To: 'Gary Tully [via ActiveMQ]' > Subject: RE: EXT :Re: Message Priority In 5.5.0-fuse-00-4

RE: EXT :Re: Message Priority In 5.5.0-fuse-00-43

2011-08-02 Thread urciolo
, July 29, 2011 11:58 AM To: 'Gary Tully [via ActiveMQ]' Subject: RE: EXT :Re: Message Priority In 5.5.0-fuse-00-43 I changed from a listener to a consumer.receive and set the prefetch to 0. The behavior is the same as with the message listener and prefetch set to 1. From: Gary Tully [vi

RE: EXT :Re: Message Priority In 5.5.0-fuse-00-43

2011-07-29 Thread urciolo
, Kevin J (IS) Subject: Re: EXT :Re: Message Priority In 5.5.0-fuse-00-43 if you use prefetch=0, do you still see that behavior? On 28 July 2011 21:07, urciolo <[hidden email]> wrote: > Hello, I took a look at the test cases. I modified one a bit to reproduce > the behavior I am seein

Re: EXT :Re: Message Priority In 5.5.0-fuse-00-43

2011-07-28 Thread Gary Tully
           //ActiveMQMessageConsumer consumer = (ActiveMQMessageConsumer) > consumerSession.createConsumer(dest); > > > > From: Gary Tully [via ActiveMQ] > [mailto:ml-node+3696786-639262666-139...@n4.nabble.com] > Sent: Tuesday, July 26, 2011 3:39 PM > To: Urciolo, Kevin J (IS)

RE: EXT :Re: Message Priority In 5.5.0-fuse-00-43

2011-07-28 Thread urciolo
umer consumer = (ActiveMQMessageConsumer) consumerSession.createConsumer(dest); From: Gary Tully [via ActiveMQ] [mailto:ml-node+3696786-639262666-139...@n4.nabble.com] Sent: Tuesday, July 26, 2011 3:39 PM To: Urciolo, Kevin J (IS) Subject: Re: EXT :Re: Message Priority In 5.5.0-fuse-00-43 so that is not exp

RE: EXT :Re: Message Priority In 5.5.0-fuse-00-43

2011-07-26 Thread urciolo
-639262666-139...@n4.nabble.com] Sent: Tuesday, July 26, 2011 3:39 PM To: Urciolo, Kevin J (IS) Subject: Re: EXT :Re: Message Priority In 5.5.0-fuse-00-43 so that is not expected. Have a peek over one of the message priority test cases to see if there is something different from your scenario, you

Re: EXT :Re: Message Priority In 5.5.0-fuse-00-43

2011-07-26 Thread Gary Tully
, Kevin J (IS) > Subject: EXT :Re: Message Priority In 5.5.0-fuse-00-43 > > if you have concurrent producers and consumers, then the prefetch has > an effect as a consumer will get a batch of messages which will get > delivered with relative priority.. but there may be others with

RE: EXT :Re: Message Priority In 5.5.0-fuse-00-43

2011-07-26 Thread urciolo
+3696461-369868383-139...@n4.nabble.com] Sent: Tuesday, July 26, 2011 1:38 PM To: Urciolo, Kevin J (IS) Subject: EXT :Re: Message Priority In 5.5.0-fuse-00-43 if you have concurrent producers and consumers, then the prefetch has an effect as a consumer will get a batch of messages which will get

Re: Message Priority In 5.5.0-fuse-00-43

2011-07-26 Thread Gary Tully
:18, urciolo wrote: > I am testing out message priority in 5.5.0-fuse-00-43. > > I have prioritization enabled, and a maxPageSize of 5000.  When I consume > 230 messages with priorities 0-9, almost all of them are consumed in the > correct priority.  However, the last 20 or so se

Message Priority In 5.5.0-fuse-00-43

2011-07-26 Thread urciolo
I am testing out message priority in 5.5.0-fuse-00-43. I have prioritization enabled, and a maxPageSize of 5000. When I consume 230 messages with priorities 0-9, almost all of them are consumed in the correct priority. However, the last 20 or so seem to start the priority consumption over again