I think he's using European-style formatting, and that those numbers are
forty-five thousand, ninety thousand, etc.
Those numbers sound great to me; I was always getting numbers in the order
of magnitude of 1000 like Quinn said, even though I expected to go faster
since we only did non-persistent
That seems very slow for a simple throughput test - my simple Camel tests have
usually been in the 1000’s msgs/sec range.
Can you share the full test?
> On Mar 31, 2016, at 12:01 AM, Frizz wrote:
>
> In an atempt to improve the throughput of my system I did various tests. I
> started with a si
In an atempt to improve the throughput of my system I did various tests. I
started with a simple setup:
- 1 Topic, non persistent
- 1 Producer
- 1 Consumer
- Messge size: 4k
- Active MQ 5.12.1
My system is reasonably fast (8 cores, 32GB memory, SSD) - still I only
manage to send & receive about 45
