tp://activemq.org/
> Apache Camel - http://activemq.org/camel/
> Apache ServiceMix - http://servicemix.org/
> Apache Geronimo - http://geronimo.apache.org/
>
> Blog: http://bruceblog.org/
>
>
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Maximum-number-of-durable-topics-per-MQ-instance.-tp15471104s2354p15509070.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
ceMix - http://servicemix.org/
> Apache Geronimo - http://geronimo.apache.org/
>
> Blog: http://bruceblog.org/
>
>
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Maximum-number-of-durable-topics-per-MQ-instance.-tp15471104s2354p15493463.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 8:55 AM, ttmdev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Re the reference to "AIO", does this mean support for AIO4J or that AMQ's use
> of NIO is considered asynchronous i/o?
It's a reference to AIO4J:
http://www.alphaworks.ibm.com/tech/aio4j
See the following for more informati
stic numbers for the
>> maximum
>> durable topic subscribers?
>>
>> Is ActiveMQ capable of handling durable subscribers in the thousands
>> i.e.
>> 5000 subscribers or is a number like this pushing the limits.
>>
>> Please advise.
&
> durable topic subscribers?
>>
>> Is ActiveMQ capable of handling durable subscribers in the thousands
>> i.e.
>> 5000 subscribers or is a number like this pushing the limits.
>>
>> Please advise.
>>
>> Thank you,
>>
>> Dave
>>
http://www.nabble.com/Maximum-number-of-durable-topics-per-MQ-instance.-tp15471104s2354p15471104.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
ActiveMQ certainly is capable of handling a large number of durable
subscribers - but I for one haven't tested the upper li
ximum
durable topic subscribers?
Is ActiveMQ capable of handling durable subscribers in the thousands i.e.
5000 subscribers or is a number like this pushing the limits.
Please advise.
Thank you,
Dave
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Maximum-number-of-durable-topics-p
