61616(localhost) has been
>> established.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> James.Strachan wrote:
>> >
>> > On 3/14/07, naga007 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Thare are no errors, but both become the master.
>> >
>&
om/0112098/
>
>
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Master-Slave-locking-with-MYSQL-is-not-working-with-4.1.1-tf3399897s2354.html#a9475786
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--
James
---
http://radio.weblogs.com/0112098/
DBC
> adapter based on the driver name)
> --
>
> James
> ---
> http://radio.weblogs.com/0112098/
>
>
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Master-Slave-locking-with-MYSQL-is-not-working-with-4.1.1-tf3399897s2354.html#a9475786
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
On 3/14/07, naga007 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Thare are no errors, but both become the master.
Could you post the log please? I wonder which jdbc driver is being
used (we try to auto-detect the driver and use the correct JDBC
adapter based on the driver name)
--
James
---
http://radio.we
--
>> >
>> > James
>> > ---
>> > http://radio.weblogs.com/0112098/
>> >
>> >
>>
>> --
>> View this message in context:
>> http://www.nabble.com/Master-Slave-locking-with-MYSQL-is-not-working-with-4.1.1-tf3399897s2
; Which date of the 4.1-SNAPSHOT did you try?
> --
>
> James
> ---
> http://radio.weblogs.com/0112098/
>
>
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Master-Slave-locking-with-MYSQL-is-not-working-with-4.1.1-tf3399897s2354.html#a9474993
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User ma
w this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Master-Slave-locking-with-MYSQL-is-not-working-with-4.1.1-tf3399897s2354.html#a9474993
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
On 3/14/07, naga007 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Iam using mysql 5.1 and it seems like master slave lock issue is still not
fixed on 4.1.1 latest snapshot. would appreciate any feedback from activemq
guys.
Which date of the 4.1-SNAPSHOT did you try?
--
James
---
http://radio.weblogs.com/011
Iam using mysql 5.1 and it seems like master slave lock issue is still not
fixed on 4.1.1 latest snapshot. would appreciate any feedback from activemq
guys.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Master-Slave-locking-with-MYSQL-is-not-working-with-4.1.1-tf3399897s2354.html
