Re: Local shared filesystem master slave with geo-redundant pure master slave

2011-09-29 Thread Stevo Slavić
Thanks Torsten for reply and clarifications! Obviously I didn't understand well the difference between master/slave and network of brokers. I think performance constraints are not too high, having HA is more important - message received must be consumed if at least one broker & consumer is runnin

Re: Local shared filesystem master slave with geo-redundant pure master slave

2011-09-29 Thread Torsten Mielke
> Can failover protocol be used for network connectors? Yes, please see http://tmielke.blogspot.com/2011/09/activemq-network-bridge-to-masterslave.html > Can destinations and > messages be shared for HA across the geo-redundant nodes? Using a network connector you do not share messages between

Local shared filesystem master slave with geo-redundant pure master slave

2011-09-28 Thread Stevo Slavić
Hello ActiveMQ users, Imagine 4 nodes, 2 per location, on each node on same location/LAN a shared filesystem (separate node) used by two local brokers in shared filesystem master slave (SFSMS) configuration. Can destinations and messages be shared for HA across the geo-redundant nodes? Can failov