Re: Cached LDAP Authorization Module

wrote: > > Hi all – curious if there’s a reason why the documentation for the Cached LDAP Authorization Module at: > > https://activemq.apache.org/cached-ldap-authorization-module > > Does not include any information on the following properties that the modu

Re: Cached LDAP Authorization Module

On Wed, Feb 16, 2022 at 6:50 AM Krusch, Chris wrote: > > Hi all – curious if there’s a reason why the documentation for the Cached > LDAP Authorization Module at: > > https://activemq.apache.org/cached-ldap-authorization-module > > Does not include any information on the followi

Cached LDAP Authorization Module

Hi all – curious if there’s a reason why the documentation for the Cached LDAP Authorization Module at: https://activemq.apache.org/cached-ldap-authorization-module Does not include any information on the following properties that the module has long supported: Property Default value

Re: LDAP authorization with multiple LDAP servers

ation, wouldn't it? Am I right in assuming that a documentation patch should target the following file? https://github.com/apache/activemq-website/blob/master/src/cached-ldap-authorization-module.md Cheers, Janus Justin Bertram wrote: > Under the covers the cachedLDAPAuthoriz

Re: LDAP authorization with multiple LDAP servers

uot; > userObjectClass="person" > userNameAttribute="uid" > /> > > > > > > > Now we plan to add some redundancy / high-availability for the

LDAP authorization with multiple LDAP servers

oes ActiveMQ have support for working with multiple LDAP servers? The documentation at https://activemq.apache.org/cached-ldap-authorization-module does not give any hint on whether the connectionURL can specify multiple servers. However I found another reference to the JAAS LDAP Login Module at

Re: ActiveMQ LDAP Authorization Issue

jectClass: groupOfNames > cn: write > member: cn=admins > member: cn=publishers > member: cn=consumers* > > Could you please help me as to why I get the security exception? Any ideas? > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-LDAP-Authorization-Issue-tp4660204.html > Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

ActiveMQ LDAP Authorization Issue

: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-LDAP-Authorization-Issue-tp4660204.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: LDAP Authorization

complete but I need to finish unit tests before >> I send the patch. >> >> Regards, >> NGC >> >> >> Sagi Mann wrote: >>> >>> Hi, are there any news on this? Could you provide the link to your >>> thread in the dev forum? >>> >>> >>> >> >> > > -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/LDAP-Authorization-tp4861283p29493119.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: LDAP Authorization

at is complete but I need to finish unit tests before I send > the patch. > > Regards, > NGC > > > Sagi Mann wrote: >> >> Hi, are there any news on this? Could you provide the link to your thread >> in the dev forum? >> >> >>

Where to find example ldap authorization setup?

Hi, I'm just starting with the 5.2 snapshot today. I know very little about activemq. The release notes for 5.2 suggest that ldap authorization is working. I want to use the http servlet and REST interface. But processes must authenticate before being able to send or receive. I ne