mq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/JMSXGroupID-timeout-tp3934661p4265945.html
> Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
Is it also guaranteed with the Spring DefaultMessageListenerContainer when
the number of active consumer can vary over the time?
Regards
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/JMSXGroupID-timeout-tp3934661p4265945.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list
max available
> consumers, thus there is no real need for cleaning the mapping
> groupId-to-consumer.
>
>
> http://stackoverflow.com/questions/703659/activemq-message-grouping-performance
>
> Is that correct?
>
> Regards
>
> --
> View this message in context:
&
-grouping-performance
Is that correct?
Regards
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/JMSXGroupID-timeout-tp3934661p4261209.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
entyx.
***
*
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Out-of-Office-AutoReply-JMSXGroupID-timeout-tp4257370p4257370.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
(the negative JMSXGroupID value)?
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/JMSXGroupID-timeout-tp3934661p4257363.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> Thanks...
>
> Roger
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/JMSXGroupID-timeout-tp3934661p3934661.html
> Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/JMSXGroupID-timeout-tp3934661p3934661.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
