Re: JMS to JMS Bridge vs Network of Brokers

That's what it looks like. Both bridges (A to B, and B to A) are defined on one broker. Looks good. -- View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/JMS-to-JMS-Bridge-vs-Network-of-Brokers-tp4681063p4681121.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archi

Re: JMS to JMS Bridge vs Network of Brokers

xplain the messages shown as in the queues, but inaccessible as that happens when message TTLs (max network hops) expire. Can you use a JMS bridge on broker A that only forwards the Queues needed? -- View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/JMS-to-JMS-Bridge-vs-Network-

Re: JMS to JMS Bridge vs Network of Brokers

we configured it. *Broker A:* *Broker B* -- View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/JMS-to-JMS-Bridge-vs-Network-of-Brokers-tp4681063p4681120.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

JMS to JMS Bridge vs Network of Brokers

S-Bridge-td2344418.html> Is it better to just use a Network of Brokers instead of JMS Bridge when going across data centers? Or will JMS Bridge work just fine, and we have a configuration problem? *Broker A Configuration:**Broker B Configuration:* -- View this message in context: http://activ