Has anyone ever done an implementation using transactions to ensure
>>> the
>>> consume/send pair commits as a unit? It would be possible here for
>>> the send
>>> to succeed and the acknowledge to fail resulting in duplicates being
>>> sent
>>
e possible here for
>> the send
>> to succeed and the acknowledge to fail resulting in duplicates being
>> sent
>> eventually.
>>
>> Thanks
>> -Don
>> --
>> View this message in context:
>> http://www.nabble.com/JMS-Bridge-retries-a
sent
eventually.
Thanks
-Don
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/JMS-Bridge-retries-and-transactions-tp18031980p18031980.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Hi Don - the recommended approach for JMS bridges is to now use Camel
- see
http://www.nabble.com/JMS-Bridge-retries-and-transactions-tp18031980p18031980.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
