What about the server side components, for example the ability to have
multiple durable consumers with same client id for topics? This is a
really nice feature.
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/JMS-2-0-alignment-tp4668129p4668601.html
Sent from the Active
particular bits that are of interest, feel free to
contribute a first stab and attach it to a jira. We love contributions
:-)
On 12 June 2013 19:41, guerra wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I was just wondering about the JMS 2.0 alignment. Is there any news about
> the JMS 2.0 support?
&
I had the same question. No plans?
I've also had a quick look at the Apache Apollo site, and see little mention
of JMS on there.
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/JMS-2-0-alignment-tp4668129p4668563.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive
Hi,
I was just wondering about the JMS 2.0 alignment. Is there any news about
the JMS 2.0 support?
Thank you
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/JMS-2-0-alignment-tp4668129.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
