Messages are left in memory with JDBC persistance for queues when no consumers

2009-08-20 Thread chrajanirao
dump, if you are interested. I am using ActiveMQ 5.2. Please let me know if this behavior is a bug or if its expected and why. Thanks, Rajani. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Messages-are-left-in-memory-with-JDBC-persistance-for-queues-when-no-consumers-tp25069583p25069583

RE: JDBC Persistance

2007-04-02 Thread Ramesh Bobba
e.org Subject: Re: JDBC Persistance There is a lag if using the journal based on the journal checkpoint time; so using pure JDBC and no journal will use less disk (though be much slower). Also there is a further lag if you are using durable topics (since the deletion of messages is a background

Re: JDBC Persistance

2007-04-02 Thread James Strachan
To: users@activemq.apache.org Subject: Re: JDBC Persistance On 4/1/07, Ramesh Bobba <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I have three producers producing 80K messages every 2 seconds, I have > three consumers subscribed as durable consumers. I am using mysql as > persistence. What I see is that the mess

RE: JDBC Persistance

2007-04-02 Thread Ramesh Bobba
- From: James Strachan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, April 02, 2007 1:27 AM To: users@activemq.apache.org Subject: Re: JDBC Persistance On 4/1/07, Ramesh Bobba <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I have three producers producing 80K messages every 2 seconds, I have > three consumer

Re: JDBC Persistance

2007-04-02 Thread James Strachan
On 4/1/07, Ramesh Bobba <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I have three producers producing 80K messages every 2 seconds, I have three consumers subscribed as durable consumers. I am using mysql as persistence. What I see is that the messages are being written to the database even when all the subscriber

JDBC Persistance

2007-03-31 Thread Ramesh Bobba
I have three producers producing 80K messages every 2 seconds, I have three consumers subscribed as durable consumers. I am using mysql as persistence. What I see is that the messages are being written to the database even when all the subscribers are up. I thought that broker only writes to the da

RE: JDBC persistance in AMQ 4.1.0

2007-02-01 Thread Nilantha Jayalath
Thank you James, -Nilantha -Original Message- From: James Strachan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, February 01, 2007 8:38 AM To: activemq-users@geronimo.apache.org Subject: Re: JDBC persistance in AMQ 4.1.0 On 1/30/07, Nilantha Jayalath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: &g

Re: JDBC persistance in AMQ 4.1.0

2007-02-01 Thread James Strachan
On 1/30/07, Nilantha Jayalath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi Rob, Thank you for the response and your time. Actually my main worry is what happens if my journal files are lost due to a hardware failure before moving messages into the long term store. Then you are hosed. If you cannot rely on loc