times, even if there are N slaves waiting
> idle for the lock?
>
> Is it possible to combine the above failover solution with load balancing,
> i.e. having more than one active master, all of them sharing the same JDBC
> persistence store?
> --
> View this message in context:
&g
iting
idle for the lock?
Is it possible to combine the above failover solution with load balancing,
i.e. having more than one active master, all of them sharing the same JDBC
persistence store?
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/JDBC-Master-Slave-Patter-Understa
