ucer.setDeliveryMode(DeliveryMode.NON_PERSISTENT)
> but it seems that the broker does use persistency on these messages because
> the log files are updated.
> Am I missing something?
>
> Hagai.
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://www.nabble.com/High-availabi
based Master Slave only work for persistent
>> messaging.
>>
>> If you don't want persistence, try Pure Master Slave (or even just
>> failover on the client).
>> --
>> James
>> ---
>> http://macstrac.blogspot.com/
>>
>> Open Source Integration
>> http://open.iona.com
>>
>>
>
>
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/High-availability-and-persistency-tp14240560s2354p14249961.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
just
> failover on the client).
> --
> James
> ---
> http://macstrac.blogspot.com/
>
> Open Source Integration
> http://open.iona.com
>
>
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/High-availability-and-persistency-tp14240560s2354p14249528.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
On 09/12/2007, hagai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi,
> I am trying to use the "Shared File System Master Slave" configuration, and
> I have a few questions:
>
> 1. I don't want to use persistency. Is that possible using this
> configuration? I am asking this since the example in
> http://activem
bscriber. I have a master broker and a slave
broker running. I stop the master broker, and the slave broker takes over
after 10 seconds.
However, I don't get all the messages I sent in the subscribers. Why could
this happen?
Thanks,
Hagai.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.na
