}
final SessionInfo sessionInfo = new SessionInfo(sessionId);
sendToActiveMQ(sessionInfo,null);
Hope this helps.
Regards,
Pieter Naaijkens
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Getting-Stomp-support-to-a-usable-state...-tf38
On 6/21/07, Tom Samplonius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
- "James Strachan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
...
> Just use the JAAS plugin in ActiveMQ and you're good to go; the Stomp
> code uses whatever security plugin you're using
As has been discussed, this is broken, and has been since 4.1.
- "James Strachan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
...
> Just use the JAAS plugin in ActiveMQ and you're good to go; the Stomp
> code uses whatever security plugin you're using
As has been discussed, this is broken, and has been since 4.1.1 or earlier.
Is there any sort of roadmap to the Act
- "PieterN" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Patch:
> ---
> ../../../activemq-snapshot/src/activemq-core/src/main/java/org/apache/activemq/transport/stomp/ProtocolConverter.java
>
...
I've tried this patch, and it doesn't change anything. Stomp clients can
still connect with any userna
throw new
ProtocolException(exception.getException().getMessage());
+ }
+ }
final SessionInfo sessionInfo = new
SessionInfo(sessionId);
sendToActiveMQ(sessionInfo,null);
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Getting-Stomp-support-to-a-usable-state...-tf38
I've added some documentation about the webconsole and I included a
section about how to password protect it (although only on jetty, but
I hope the folks will figure out how to 'translate'' that to tomcat by
themself :).
And for the JMX-password issue there is a patch by Andrew Deason
(https://is
- "James Strachan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 6/2/07, Tom Samplonius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > How much more work needs to occur to get Stomp protocol support to
> a usable state?
>
> Huh? :) Its very useable right now
James,
Another component of getting Stomp to a usable
- "James Strachan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 6/2/07, Tom Samplonius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > How much more work needs to occur to get Stomp protocol support to
> a usable state?
>
> Huh? :) Its very useable right now
>
>
> > The biggest issue is lack of any authentication
On 6/2/07, Tom Samplonius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
How much more work needs to occur to get Stomp protocol support to a usable
state?
Huh? :) Its very useable right now
The biggest issue is lack of any authentication support for Stomp, so anyone
with access to the Stomp port can get a
- "Tom Samplonius" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The Web Console has similar issues. There is no easy way to
> password protect it. But if you password protect JMX access, it will
> break the Web Console.
...
I was wrong here. I based my comment on this bug report:
http://www.nabble.c
How much more work needs to occur to get Stomp protocol support to a usable
state? The biggest issue is lack of any authentication support for Stomp, so
anyone with access to the Stomp port can get and send anything. I can't
imagine that anyone is using Stomp in production yet.
But is an
11 matches
Mail list logo
