BTW. we have open feature request for the broker rebalance message groups
when consumers are added/removed (
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-2106). I think that's the best way
to handle this use case. In any case, any contribution in this area is
welcomed.
Regards
--
Dejan Bosanac - ht
Hi,
> So it sounds like the current Message Groups behaviour is fine; its
> just you want to ensure fair load balancing of the message groups
> across consumers right? So if lots of other clients are restarted; the
> long running clients could end up claiming too many of the message
> groups?
Yes
Hi,
On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 4:00 PM, boday wrote:
> Martin, message groups (by design) guarantee that only a single consumer will
> process messages for a group at a time.
Yes, I am aware of that. My problem at the moment is only, that it
will always be the SAME consumer processing the message gr
before the first has been processed. So my idea would be to add a
>>> configuration option, that a consumer will release the message group
>>> directly after consuming its current message, releasing the message
>>> group for re-distribution to other brokers.
>>>
>>
uld be to add a
>>> configuration option, that a consumer will release the message group
>>> directly after consuming its current message, releasing the message
>>> group for re-distribution to other brokers.
>>>
>>> Would something like this be possible
> directly after consuming its current message, releasing the message
>> group for re-distribution to other brokers.
>>
>> Would something like this be possible / do I overlook some downside of
>> this approach?
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Martin
>>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Fwd-Message-groups-enhancement-feature-request-tp3635293p3637432.html
> Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
his be possible / do I overlook some downside of
> this approach?
>
> Best regards,
> Martin
>
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Fwd-Message-groups-enhancement-feature-request-tp3635293p3637432.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Hi,
we currently use message groups to ensure ordered delivery of messages
within a given group. As noted on the documentation for message
groups, this often does not scale very well with variable consumer
counts, as in this case the oldest consumers will hog all message
groups.
In our use-case,
