Re: FailoverTransport in 5.1 seems to make more noise...

2008-02-01 Thread Jason Rosenberg
I've logged an issue: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-1574 Jason -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/FailoverTransport-in-5.1-seems-to-make-more-noise...-tp15211718s2354p15227526.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: FailoverTransport in 5.1 seems to make more noise...

2008-01-31 Thread Rob Davies
he FailoverTransport passes on the underlying tcp socket timeout due to inactivity? Thanks, Jason -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/FailoverTransport-in-5.1-seems-to-make-more-noise...-tp15211718s2354p15211718.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble

FailoverTransport in 5.1 seems to make more noise...

2008-01-31 Thread Jason Rosenberg
ason why in 5.1, the FailoverTransport passes on the underlying tcp socket timeout due to inactivity? Thanks, Jason -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/FailoverTransport-in-5.1-seems-to-make-more-noise...-tp15211718s2354p15211718.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.