Re: Failover with networkConnectors

2012-02-27 Thread hodgesz
Are there any drawbacks to turning on thread pools in terms of performance? It would seem like it would use less memory but might have switching costs. -- View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Failover-with-networkConnectors-tp4415677p4425654.html Sent from the

Re: Failover with networkConnectors

2012-02-27 Thread hodgesz
make the connection for the bridge. -- View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Failover-with-networkConnectors-tp4415677p4424713.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: Failover with networkConnectors

2012-02-27 Thread Laures
please note that if you are using activemq 5.5 there is a bug in the failover mechanism that can keep your network bridges from beeing created. see: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-3575 -- View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Failover-with

Re: Failover with networkConnectors

2012-02-23 Thread hodgesz
xt: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Failover-with-networkConnectors-tp4415677p4415770.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: Failover with networkConnectors

2012-02-23 Thread mserrano
xception: Invalid broker URI, no scheme specified: > start > java.lang.RuntimeException: Failed to execute start task. Reason: > java.lang.Ill > galArgumentException: Invalid broker URI, no scheme specified: start > -- View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com

Failover with networkConnectors

2012-02-23 Thread hodgesz
greatly appreciated. -Jonathan -- View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Failover-with-networkConnectors-tp4415677p4415677.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.