Re: Failover and updateClusterClients

2010-06-24 Thread Mark White
rajdavies wrote: > > This is a new feature in 5.4 - so we are all newbies to it ;) - answers > inlined: > Ah. I just noticed that 5.4 is not yet in stable branch. I didn't realise these features were *that* new :) -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble

Re: Failover and updateClusterClients

2010-06-24 Thread Mark White
> but on the client side - use tcp:// instead of nio - you will get better performance. Thanks for the advice on this, and the rest of your answer. Much appreciated. Mark... -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/Failover-and-updateClusterClients-tp28967819p28979962.html S

Re: Failover and updateClusterClients

2010-06-24 Thread Rob Davies
rmance. > > 4) If broker A is restored, will the client be advised of this on the next > successful communication with any broker? If not, when or how? Yes the client will be informed about it > > Thanks for any clarification anyone can give. > > > Mark... > -- > View

Failover and updateClusterClients

2010-06-22 Thread Mark White
1616)"? 4) If broker A is restored, will the client be advised of this on the next successful communication with any broker? If not, when or how? Thanks for any clarification anyone can give. Mark... -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/Failover-and-updateClusterClient