Shared File System flavors of master/slave have the same
> limitation?
>
> -Original Message-
> From: ttmdev [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2008 3:51 PM
> To: users@activemq.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Errors using Pure Master/Slave
>
>
Do the JDBC and Shared File System flavors of master/slave have the same
limitation?
-Original Message-
From: ttmdev [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2008 3:51 PM
To: users@activemq.apache.org
Subject: Re: Errors using Pure Master/Slave
I think you'll have b
at
> org.apache.activemq.thread.DedicatedTaskRunner.runTask(DedicatedTaskRunn
> er.java:98)
> at
> org.apache.activemq.thread.DedicatedTaskRunner$1.run(DedicatedTaskRunner
> .java:36)
>
>
> The broker config files are attached. The brokers and the pr
I forgot the attachments. Here's the config I'm using.
-Original Message-
From: Breen, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2008 12:46 PM
To: users@activemq.apache.org
Subject: Errors using Pure Master/Slave
Hello,
I'm trying to get a pu
Hello,
I'm trying to get a pure master slave configuration working. Ideally
I'd like to have the brokers be persistent, but I've cut my
configuration back so that it is as simple as possible and pretty much
matches the example master and slave configuration in the test code
base. Still I get err
