Re: Automatically removing inactive durable topic subscribers

00 > > -1 > > > Best Regards, > Shiv > > -Original Message- > From: Justin Bertram > Sent: Wednesday, October 11, 2023 12:41 AM > To: users@activemq.apache.org > Subject: Re: Automatically removing inactive durable topic subscribers > > > > CAU

RE: Automatically removing inactive durable topic subscribers

: Automatically removing inactive durable topic subscribers CAUTION: EXTERNAL EMAIL - Sent from an email domain that is not formally trusted by Eurofins. Do not click on links or open attachments unless you recognise the sender and are certain that the content is safe. I forgot to include this for the

Re: Automatically removing inactive durable topic subscribers

t/address-settings.html#address-settings > > On Tue, Oct 10, 2023 at 6:47 AM Shiv Kumar Dixit > wrote: > >> Hi, >> If there a way in Artemis broker to automatically remove inactive durable >> topic subscribers. E.g. check every hour of inactive subsc

Re: Automatically removing inactive durable topic subscribers

gs.html#address-settings On Tue, Oct 10, 2023 at 6:47 AM Shiv Kumar Dixit wrote: > Hi, > If there a way in Artemis broker to automatically remove inactive durable > topic subscribers. E.g. check every hour of inactive subscribers and remove > the one who are not active for last 12 hours. &g

Automatically removing inactive durable topic subscribers

Hi, If there a way in Artemis broker to automatically remove inactive durable topic subscribers. E.g. check every hour of inactive subscribers and remove the one who are not active for last 12 hours. Classic ActiveMQ has some configuration (https://activemq.apache.org/manage-durable

Re: ActiveMQ inactive connection in Active Non-Durable Topic Subscribers

Sounds great, thank you. Tim On Sun, Apr 11, 2021, 7:16 AM Prameet Patil wrote: > Yes definitely. > I don't have access to the source code of the JMS clients. so i am not sure > if i will be able to reproduce it in a clean environment. > but will definitely give it a try and create a JIRA if i

Re: ActiveMQ inactive connection in Active Non-Durable Topic Subscribers

Yes definitely. I don't have access to the source code of the JMS clients. so i am not sure if i will be able to reproduce it in a clean environment. but will definitely give it a try and create a JIRA if i can reproduce it.

Re: ActiveMQ inactive connection in Active Non-Durable Topic Subscribers

Be sure you understand what advisory support actually gives you (i.e. what you're giving up by turning it off) before you lock into this workaround as a permanent solution. See https://activemq.apache.org/advisory-message for more info. Also, if you're able to reproduce the problem reliably, would

Re: ActiveMQ inactive connection in Active Non-Durable Topic Subscribers

got it thanks!! On Sun, Apr 11, 2021 at 11:52 AM JB Onofré wrote: > If you don’t disable advisory support, yes. > > > Le 11 avr. 2021 à 07:47, Prameet Patil a > écrit : > > > > ok, the topic ActiveMQ.Advisory.TempQueue,ActiveMQ.Advisory.TempTopic > > looks like an advisory topic. > > if i del

Re: ActiveMQ inactive connection in Active Non-Durable Topic Subscribers

If you don’t disable advisory support, yes. > Le 11 avr. 2021 à 07:47, Prameet Patil a écrit : > > ok, the topic ActiveMQ.Advisory.TempQueue,ActiveMQ.Advisory.TempTopic > looks like an advisory topic. > if i delete the above topic it will just be recreated right ??? > >> On Sun, Apr 11, 2021

Re: ActiveMQ inactive connection in Active Non-Durable Topic Subscribers

ok, the topic ActiveMQ.Advisory.TempQueue,ActiveMQ.Advisory.TempTopic looks like an advisory topic. if i delete the above topic it will just be recreated right ??? On Sun, Apr 11, 2021 at 11:06 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofre wrote: > I meant that as soon as you use it on a client (subscriber or publis

Re: ActiveMQ inactive connection in Active Non-Durable Topic Subscribers

I meant that as soon as you use it on a client (subscriber or publisher), ActiveMQ creates the topic. That’s for normal topic. For the AdvisoryTopic, you can just disable advisory support in activemq.xml: Then the advisory topics won’t be created. Regards JB > Le 11 avr. 2021 à 07:31, Prame

Re: ActiveMQ inactive connection in Active Non-Durable Topic Subscribers

We are not specifically using this topic. it looks like activemq itself uses it.

Re: ActiveMQ inactive connection in Active Non-Durable Topic Subscribers

rics are exposed using a JMX >>>> agent >>>> org_apache_activemq_Broker_CurrentConnectionsCount >>>> using above metric i can see that number of connections to my broker is >>>> around 850 >>>> but when i check the OS level connec

Re: ActiveMQ inactive connection in Active Non-Durable Topic Subscribers

xposed using a JMX >> > agent >> > org_apache_activemq_Broker_CurrentConnectionsCount >> > using above metric i can see that number of connections to my broker is >> > around 850 >> > but when i check the OS level connection by doing *netstat *i can see

Re: ActiveMQ inactive connection in Active Non-Durable Topic Subscribers

at *i can see > only > > 200 connections. > > when digging further i can see that i have too many inactive > > connections in *Active > > Non-Durable Topic Subscribers *(in subscribers tab) and when i click on > the > > clientID i get > > >

Re: ActiveMQ inactive connection in Active Non-Durable Topic Subscribers

r i can see that i have too many inactive > connections in *Active > Non-Durable Topic Subscribers *(in subscribers tab) and when i click on the > clientID i get > > No connection could be found for ID ID:client_id-random_number > > > > And all these inactive cl

ActiveMQ inactive connection in Active Non-Durable Topic Subscribers

200 connections. when digging further i can see that i have too many inactive connections in *Active Non-Durable Topic Subscribers *(in subscribers tab) and when i click on the clientID i get No connection could be found for ID ID:client_id-random_number And all these inactive clients are

Re: offline Durable Topic Subscribers issue in activemq 5.15.8

I am not an expert, but if this issue seems something that can be tackled with guidance, I can take a look? On Wed, 27 May 2020 at 17:42, Tim Bain wrote: > No, I haven't yet found the block of time needed to reproduce the problem > and identify the root cause. Sorry, I know it's frustrating to a

Re: offline Durable Topic Subscribers issue in activemq 5.15.8

No, I haven't yet found the block of time needed to reproduce the problem and identify the root cause. Sorry, I know it's frustrating to ask for help and not get it, but I do this as a volunteer in my personal time, and just haven't found a large enough block of time when there wasn't something els

Re: offline Durable Topic Subscribers issue in activemq 5.15.8

Hello Tim, Did you manage to have a look on the issue? Regards Ashish -- Sent from: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-User-f2341805.html

Re: offline Durable Topic Subscribers issue in activemq 5.15.8

Hello Tim, I have updated https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-7350, so that you can reproduce the issue Regards Ashish -- Sent from: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-User-f2341805.html

Re: offline Durable Topic Subscribers issue in activemq 5.15.8

Hello Tim, Did you see my comments? Regards Ashish -- Sent from: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-User-f2341805.html

Re: offline Durable Topic Subscribers issue in activemq 5.15.8

Hello Tim, What I meant wrt to 7/8 broker is as follows: 1. I have one frontend broker which only have topics. These topics are then subscribed by the backend broker 2. Each backend broker can have many routes, which means that a single backend broker(with n number of queues) can subscribe to a

Re: offline Durable Topic Subscribers issue in activemq 5.15.8

What does "7/8 backend brokers with a lot of routes" mean? My description of your setup specified either a broker or a master-slave pair of brokers for the backend, and you agreed that my description was correct. How did we get from there to "7/8" backend brokers? Also, can you re-confirm that the

Re: offline Durable Topic Subscribers issue in activemq 5.15.8

Hello Tim/JB, Also one more information. I tried to reproduce the issue with 1 frontend (with 1 topic) and 1 backend (with 1 camel route) and I was not able to reproduce it. I saw the issue after 7/8 backend brokers with a lot of routes. Regards Ashish -- Sent from: http://activemq.2283324

Re: offline Durable Topic Subscribers issue in activemq 5.15.8

Hello Tim, Your assumption is correct. And yes,*" reconnection logic the subscription name is being constructed incorrectly "* And yes : All my camel routes associated to a single broker run in a single jvm. Regards Ashish -- Sent from: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-Use

Re: offline Durable Topic Subscribers issue in activemq 5.15.8

Hi Tim, The subscription is firstly client provided (and fallback to client id if not specified). Regards JB On 27/11/2019 07:59, Tim Bain wrote: > OK, so I want to make sure I understand this correctly. > > You have two brokers (or is that two failover pairs?): frontend-standard-01 > and backe

Re: offline Durable Topic Subscribers issue in activemq 5.15.8

OK, so I want to make sure I understand this correctly. You have two brokers (or is that two failover pairs?): frontend-standard-01 and backend-broker-name-1. The brokers are not configured in a network of brokers, though you're using your Camel routes to move messages between them. You have some

Re: offline Durable Topic Subscribers issue in activemq 5.15.8

Hi, honestly, I don't understand the problem, and I'm not able to reproduce with simple Camel routes (running in Karaf). Regards JB On 25/11/2019 14:05, Ashish Vaishno wrote: > Hello JB, > > I have not set offlineDurableSubscriberTaskSchedule or > offlineDurableSubscriberTimeout explicitly in

Re: offline Durable Topic Subscribers issue in activemq 5.15.8

Hello JB, I have not set offlineDurableSubscriberTaskSchedule or offlineDurableSubscriberTimeout explicitly in my activemq.xml file. Regards Ashish -- Sent from: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-User-f2341805.html

Re: offline Durable Topic Subscribers issue in activemq 5.15.8

Hi What kind of component is frontend-standard ? Is it a extend you did ? Regards JB On 25/11/2019 09:57, Ashish Vaishno wrote: > Hello Tim, > > Sorry for the confusion. In my setup there are a lot of brokers which have a > similar config. WRT to hello/world example that i refered, the config

Re: offline Durable Topic Subscribers issue in activemq 5.15.8

By the way, in activemq.xml, in the broker settings, do you have offlineDurableSubscriberTimeout and offlineDurableSubscriberTaskSchedule defined or do you use the default ? Regards JB On 25/11/2019 09:57, Ashish Vaishno wrote: > Hello Tim, > > Sorry for the confusion. In my setup there are a l

Re: offline Durable Topic Subscribers issue in activemq 5.15.8

Hello Tim, Sorry for the confusion. In my setup there are a lot of brokers which have a similar config. WRT to hello/world example that i refered, the config would look like broker-1 : broker-2: broker-3: ... Regards Ashish -- Sen

Re: offline Durable Topic Subscribers issue in activemq 5.15.8

That file doesn't use "Hello" or "World" anywhere in it, and appears to have only a single route within it. Can you help me to understand how it lines up with the question you originally asked, where you have two separate durable subscriptions, for Hello and World, where one is working and the othe

Re: offline Durable Topic Subscribers issue in activemq 5.15.8

Hello Tim, In reference to https://activemq.apache.org/sample-camel-routes Please find attached the config camel.xml my brokers are running in different jvm. i have a master slave setup in the backend, so at one time only one if

Re: offline Durable Topic Subscribers issue in activemq 5.15.8

Also, to be clear, I don't believe that KahaDB has anything to do with this problem. The issue appears to be that the client ID assigned to the subscription on reconnection doesn't match the previous connection's value, which is independent of the persistence store type. Tim On Thu, Nov 21, 2019,

Re: offline Durable Topic Subscribers issue in activemq 5.15.8

Could you please share that configuration? I didn't understand from your earlier message that you were creating your subscriptions using Camel, which adds another technology, and another potential source of bugs, into the mix. Are both of your consumers staying up while the broker is restarted? A

Re: offline Durable Topic Subscribers issue in activemq 5.15.8

Hello Tim, I am setting the clientid in the file integration.camel.routes.xml, so that on each restart my durable susbcriber is always recognized and unique. Regards Ashish -- Sent from: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-User-f2341805.html

Re: offline Durable Topic Subscribers issue in activemq 5.15.8

Ashish, are you setting the clientID setting on your clients, as documented at the bottom of https://activemq.apache.org/how-do-durable-queues-and-topics-work.html? If not, then on reconnection it may be that the new connection is getting a different client ID, resulting in a different subscriber n

Re: offline Durable Topic Subscribers issue in activemq 5.15.8

Hello Tim, Please find below the config Config with kahadb http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans"; xmlns:amq="http://activemq.apache.org/schema/core"; xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"; xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans http://

Re: offline Durable Topic Subscribers issue in activemq 5.15.8

If the problem is still occurring with regular KahaDB, then KahaDB probably isn't the problem. Can you share your full broker configuration, rather than just snippets? Tim On Wed, Nov 20, 2019, 8:16 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > Basically the same as you: > > ind

Re: offline Durable Topic Subscribers issue in activemq 5.15.8

Basically the same as you: Let me try with AMQP client. I just commented the Jira. Regards JB On 20/11/2019 15:49, Ashish Vaishno wrote: > Hello Tim, > > I have tried to change mkahadb to standard kahadb as well in my dev > environment. I still face the same issue. > > >

Re: offline Durable Topic Subscribers issue in activemq 5.15.8

I also created a ticket https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-7350 -- Sent from: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-User-f2341805.html

Re: offline Durable Topic Subscribers issue in activemq 5.15.8

Hello Tim, I have tried to change mkahadb to standard kahadb as well in my dev environment. I still face the same issue. I will create a JIRA bug for the same. @JB would it be possible to share your config? Regards Ashish -- Sent from: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com

Re: offline Durable Topic Subscribers issue in activemq 5.15.8

Ashish, If you convert from mKahaDB to the standard KahaDB configuration (in a dev/test environment), does the problem disappear? If so, please write a bug in JIRA for the problem. (this mailing list thread is not sufficient to get a fix implemented). If not, we'll have to keep trying to isolate

Re: offline Durable Topic Subscribers issue in activemq 5.15.8

Hello JB, Do i need to create a Jira issue for the same or the issue created here is more than enough? Once you have a working config where you dont face the issue, please let me know Regards Ashish -- Sent from: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-User-f2341805.html

Re: offline Durable Topic Subscribers issue in activemq 5.15.8

Hi nothing special, a regular kahadb instance (with some tuning but nothing major). Regards JB On 19/11/2019 12:47, Ashish Vaishno wrote: > Hello JB, > > Can you send me the config that you are using for persistence ? Have you > enabled any parameters ? > > Regards > Ashish > > > > -- > Se

Re: offline Durable Topic Subscribers issue in activemq 5.15.8

Hello JB, Can you send me the config that you are using for persistence ? Have you enabled any parameters ? Regards Ashish -- Sent from: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-User-f2341805.html

Re: offline Durable Topic Subscribers issue in activemq 5.15.8

Hi, I guess it works using KahaDB (without filtered) ? Regards JB On 18/11/2019 16:08, Ashish Vaishno wrote: > Hello JB, > > Just a info, i am creating topics from config as well. > > Today, I tried the below > Replaced > > by > > . > > > in my mkahadb config. I will still

Re: offline Durable Topic Subscribers issue in activemq 5.15.8

Hello JB, Just a info, i am creating topics from config as well. Today, I tried the below Replaced by . in my mkahadb config. I will still not able to solve the issue Regards Ashish -- Sent from: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-User-f2341805.html

Re: offline Durable Topic Subscribers issue in activemq 5.15.8

Not yet (I was busy with on other Apache projects). I'm working on ActiveMQ during the week end, I will try to reproduce. I keep you posted. Regards JB On 15/11/2019 11:34, Ashish Vaishno wrote: > Hello JB, > > Were you able to reproduce the issue? > > Regards > Ashish > > > > -- > Sent fr

Re: offline Durable Topic Subscribers issue in activemq 5.15.8

Hello JB, Were you able to reproduce the issue? Regards Ashish -- Sent from: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-User-f2341805.html

Re: offline Durable Topic Subscribers issue in activemq 5.15.8

Thanks for the update, let me try the restart (normal use case works fine in my tests). Regards JB On 13/11/2019 09:47, Ashish Vaishno wrote: > Hello Jean, > > I also noticed that even a simple restart of the broker, causes an > inconsistent stage of offline durable subscriber. > > Did you ma

Re: offline Durable Topic Subscribers issue in activemq 5.15.8

Hello Jean, I also noticed that even a simple restart of the broker, causes an inconsistent stage of offline durable subscriber. Did you managed to find anything? Regards Ashish -- Sent from: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-User-f2341805.html

Re: offline Durable Topic Subscribers issue in activemq 5.15.8

> > > While doing so, we have noticed the below > 1. Creation of topics via config is fast > 2. But this leads to creation of "Offline Durable Topic Subscribers" with a > wrong state. > 3. From my understanding 1 client id is mapped to one subscription id whic

offline Durable Topic Subscribers issue in activemq 5.15.8

via config is fast 2. But this leads to creation of "Offline Durable Topic Subscribers" with a wrong state. 3. From my understanding 1 client id is mapped to one subscription id which is mapped to one topic. But this mapping always ends up in a different state after a restart of the brok

Re: Messages are kept in Pending queue for durable topic subscribers.

ut I'm really a newbe on ActiveMQ. -- View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Messages-are-kept-in-Pending-queue-for-durable-topic-subscribers-tp4690015p4690702.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: Messages are kept in Pending queue for durable topic subscribers.

this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Messages-are-kept-in-Pending-queue-for-durable-topic-subscribers-tp4690015p4690679.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: Messages are kept in Pending queue for durable topic subscribers.

pt-in-Pending-queue-for-durable-topic-subscribers-tp4690015p4690591.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: Messages are kept in Pending queue for durable topic subscribers.

re-kept-in-Pending-queue-for-durable-topic-subscribers-tp4690015p4690565.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: Messages are kept in Pending queue for durable topic subscribers.

he limits of a test > simulation, the presence or not of Advisory topics seemed not to influence > the behaviour of the test broker. > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Messages-are-kept-in-Pending-queue-for-durable-topic-sub

Re: Messages are kept in Pending queue for durable topic subscribers.

e the behaviour of the test broker. -- View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Messages-are-kept-in-Pending-queue-for-durable-topic-subscribers-tp4690015p4690273.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: Messages are kept in Pending queue for durable topic subscribers.

that there were quite a good number > of pending messages that were never dequeued. I wrote *was* because I tried > to turn off Advisory Messages, and since then this problem seems to have > been disappeared. > No idea how this change may affected ActiveMQ behaviour. > > > > -- >

Re: Messages are kept in Pending queue for durable topic subscribers.

s to have been disappeared. No idea how this change may affected ActiveMQ behaviour. -- View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Messages-are-kept-in-Pending-queue-for-durable-topic-subscribers-tp4690015p4690250.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: Messages are kept in Pending queue for durable topic subscribers.

; View this message in context: > http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Messages-are-kept-in-Pending-queue-for-durable-topic-subscribers-tp4690015.html > Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >

Messages are kept in Pending queue for durable topic subscribers.

Hello everyone, I have some durable topic subscribers of a certain topic ABC. When a subscriber goes offline, from ActiveMQ console I can see that messages routed to topic ABC are listed - correctly - even in ABC:subscriber's pending queue. The problem is that many messages aren't s

Re: Unsubscribing STOMP based durable topic subscribers in ActiveMQ 5.3.1?

Anyone have any thoughts on how to fix this issue on 5.3.1? Thanks, Paul On Sun, Jun 23, 2013 at 6:07 PM, Paul Gale wrote: > However, I am using ActiveMQ 5.3.1 which I believe only supports STOMP > 1.0. I thought that STOMP 1.1 support was only introduced in ActiveMQ > 5.4.x? My situation is c

Re: Unsubscribing STOMP based durable topic subscribers in ActiveMQ 5.3.1?

However, I am using ActiveMQ 5.3.1 which I believe only supports STOMP 1.0. I thought that STOMP 1.1 support was only introduced in ActiveMQ 5.4.x? My situation is confined to dealing with 5.3.1, sadly. Thanks, Paul On Sun, Jun 23, 2013 at 5:16 PM, Christian Posta wrote: > Paul, > > For STOMP 1

Re: Unsubscribing STOMP based durable topic subscribers in ActiveMQ 5.3.1?

Paul, For STOMP 1.0, ActiveMQ will treat unsubscribes using subscriptionName == clientId. If you try to unsubscribe with STOMP 1.1, it will work properly. On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 11:54 AM, Paul Gale wrote: > Hi, > > (Yes, I know this version is ancient but it's still in use around here. > We'r

Unsubscribing STOMP based durable topic subscribers in ActiveMQ 5.3.1?

Hi, (Yes, I know this version is ancient but it's still in use around here. We're in the process of upgrading to 5.8.0). Per the doc it states that it's a requirement for STOMP clients that want to create durable topic subscription to ensure that the client-id and subscription name match. What's

Re: client already connected from durable topic subscribers

ActiveMQ 5.7.0 -- View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/client-already-connected-from-durable-topic-subscribers-tp4665913p4665915.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: client already connected from durable topic subscribers

veloping this a lot. When the client crashes the subscription still shows under "Active Durable Topic Subscribers". And I haven't yet figured out how long it takes to time out...but it seems like several hours at leastyuck Trying to restart the client gives the "already

client already connected from durable topic subscribers

ent crashes the subscription still shows under "Active Durable Topic Subscribers". And I haven't yet figured out how long it takes to time out...but it seems like several hours at leastyuck Trying to restart the client gives the "already connected" which makes sense as the A

Re: Durable Topic Subscribers

B.Sc. (NUI), M.Sc. (DCU), SCSA SCNA -- View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Durable-Topic-Subscribers-tp4644454p4650106.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Network of Brokers with durable topic subscribers - switching broker not that easy?

Hello, there, I have a little problem here with my JMS layout. I have two brokers (A, B) on two machines, which are linked via network connector (static). The idea is that the producer can send to any broker and the consumer can listen to any broker and the topic to send to/receive from is availa

Re: amq 5.5.0 and pending queue sizes of durable topic subscribers

tp://fusesource.com > > ActiveMQ in Action - http://www.manning.com/snyder/ > > Blog - http://www.nighttale.net > > > > > > On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 9:58 AM, Aleksandar Ivanisevic < > > aleksan...@ivanisevic.de> wrote: > > > >> > >> Here I am aga

Re: amq 5.5.0 and pending queue sizes of durable topic subscribers

t 9:58 AM, Aleksandar Ivanisevic < > aleksan...@ivanisevic.de> wrote: > >> >> Here I am again with durable topic subscribers ;) >> >> Is it a bug or a feature that Pending Queue sizes in admin interface >> are zero, even if there are messages pending? >> >>

Re: amq 5.5.0 and pending queue sizes of durable topic subscribers

://www.nighttale.net On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 9:58 AM, Aleksandar Ivanisevic < aleksan...@ivanisevic.de> wrote: > > Here I am again with durable topic subscribers ;) > > Is it a bug or a feature that Pending Queue sizes in admin interface > are zero, even if there are messages pending? &g

amq 5.5.0 and pending queue sizes of durable topic subscribers

Here I am again with durable topic subscribers ;) Is it a bug or a feature that Pending Queue sizes in admin interface are zero, even if there are messages pending? To test this, first I have subscribed to a topic and left using stomp: > telnet adminbroker 61613 Trying 213.198.74

Re: Network of Broker - NetworkConnector & Active Durable Topic Subscribers

ed up the NetworkConnector > subscriber stays in the Active Durable Topic Subscribers and is unable to be > deleted or removed. > > Occasionally/almost never.  One of the NetworkConnector subscribers goes > offline and is able to be cleaned up or removed. > > Is there a configuration

Network of Broker - NetworkConnector & Active Durable Topic Subscribers

I am currently using ActiveMQ 5.5 with network of brokers enabled After a Subscriber goes offline and is cleaned up the NetworkConnector subscriber stays in the Active Durable Topic Subscribers and is unable to be deleted or removed. Occasionally/almost never. One of the NetworkConnector