taDirectory=../activemq-data
>
> I have been reading up on embedded vs. standalone activemq servers and have
> tried implementing both but have not met with success. My problem(s) here
> may be an obvious one - I have been looking too long at this and would
> welcome any suggestions
/localhost?broker.useJmx=false&broker.dataDirectory=../activemq-data
>
> I have been reading up on embedded vs. standalone activemq servers and have
> tried implementing both but have not met with success. My problem(s) here
> may be an obvious one - I have been looking too long at
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Duplicate-brokers-created-in-Tomcat-tp3003512p4389009.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
this happened. I'm
also not sure about whether i should worry about the previous lock issue.
Again thankful for pointers.
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Duplicate-brokers-created-in-Tomcat-tp3003512p3004783.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
4.n4.nabble.com/Duplicate-brokers-created-in-Tomcat-tp3003512p3004749.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
w:
> org.apache.activemq.broker.scheduler.SchedulerBroker
>
> So i read up and put in "schedulerSupport="false" in the activemq.xml broker
> config. That resulted in that the data directory under /bin went away, but
> the broker seems still to be created according to the lo
y there are two brokers created?? I
attached the activemq.xml for reference.
thanks in advance.
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/file/n3003512/activemq.xml
activemq.xml
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Duplicate-brokers-created-in-Tomcat-tp3003512p3003512
