Re: Depending on TransportListener for cache consistency

here are surely other possibilities of message loss when persistence is disabled. I appreciate your suggestions to consider distributed caching solutions. -- View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Depending-on-TransportListener-for-cache-consistency-tp4700535p47

Re: Depending on TransportListener for cache consistency

ge in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Depending-on-TransportListener-for-cache-consistency-tp4700535p4701174.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: Depending on TransportListener for cache consistency

e for any reason. I am now thinking we need to use durable subscribers for these cache messages, unless there is some other activemq magic that I'm overlooking. Thanks! -- View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Depending-on-TransportListener-for-cache-c

Re: Depending on TransportListener for cache consistency

nd instead use the above scheme based on > TransportListener. > > Can you see any faults in this approach? > > Thanks! > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Depending-on-TransportListener-for-cache-consistency-tp4700535.html > Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >

Depending on TransportListener for cache consistency

e scheme based on TransportListener. Can you see any faults in this approach? Thanks! -- View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Depending-on-TransportListener-for-cache-consistency-tp4700535.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.