Re: DefaultMessageListenerContainer and 5.1

2008-08-26 Thread MichaelShaw
thing was working fine in 5.0, but in 5.1, I noticed that >>> duplicate >>> messages were received. However, if I change the cacheLevelName on >>> the >>> DefaultMessageListenerContainer from the default CACHE_CONSUMER to >>> anything else, the te

Re: DefaultMessageListenerContainer and 5.1

2008-05-12 Thread Rob Davies
s message in context: http://www.nabble.com/DefaultMessageListenerContainer-and-5.1-tp17135019s2354p17136302.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. could you raise a jira for this issue so we can track it ? cheers, Rob http://open.iona.com/ -Enterprise Open Integration http://rajdavies.blogspot.com/

Re: DefaultMessageListenerContainer and 5.1

2008-05-08 Thread BlueFox
om the default CACHE_CONSUMER to > anything else, the test then runs fine. However, since I also have > exponential backoff implemented for redelivery, changing the cache level > will render the policy useless since the connection & session are > recreated by the container. > &g

DefaultMessageListenerContainer and 5.1

2008-05-08 Thread BlueFox
, since I also have exponential backoff implemented for redelivery, changing the cache level will render the policy useless since the connection & session are recreated by the container. Thoughts? -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/DefaultMessageListenerContainer-and