apache.org
Subject: Re: Datacenter failover and randomizing connections [ EXTERNAL ]
Importance: High
On 09/24/2015 05:53 PM, Basmajian, Raffi wrote:
> Tim,
>
> We missed that one! Looks promising, though the only gripe I have with that
> approach is duplication of data, creating ma
on I suggested is not supported?
Nope
>
> Raffi
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Timothy Bish [mailto:tabish...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Thursday, September 24, 2015 5:46 PM
> To: users@activemq.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Datacenter failover and randomizing connections [ EX
Bish [mailto:tabish...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, September 24, 2015 5:46 PM
To: users@activemq.apache.org
Subject: Re: Datacenter failover and randomizing connections [ EXTERNAL ]
Importance: High
On 09/24/2015 05:31 PM, Basmajian, Raffi wrote:
> Hello,
>
> We're trying to determi
On 09/24/2015 05:31 PM, Basmajian, Raffi wrote:
> Hello,
>
> We're trying to determine the correct client failover URL for this scenario:
>
> 2 brokers in New York (master/slave)
> 2 brokers in Chicago (master/slave)
>
> Client connections from NY are prioritized (and randomized) to NY; failove
Hello,
We're trying to determine the correct client failover URL for this scenario:
2 brokers in New York (master/slave)
2 brokers in Chicago (master/slave)
Client connections from NY are prioritized (and randomized) to NY; failover to
Chicago if no local brokers available.
Client connectio
