>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Consumer-performance-problem-with-Tx-tp4685226p4685365.html
> Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Consumer-performance-problem-with-Tx-tp4685226p4685365.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
ew this message in context:
> http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Consumer-performance-problem-with-Tx-tp4685226p4685279.html
> Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
directly from standard
ActiveMq connection factory (org.apache.activemq.ActiveMQConnectionFactory),
due to the fact that it is cached in the DMLC.
Thanks,
Justin
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Consumer-performance-problem-with-Tx-tp4685226p4685279.html
ld expect it can handle.
>
> Anyone got any ideas?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Justin
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Consumer-performance-problem-with-Tx-tp4685226.html
> Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
disk performance but we
do not see the disk IO jump beyond what we would expect it can handle.
Anyone got any ideas?
Thanks,
Justin
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Consumer-performance-problem-with-Tx-tp4685226.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing