Re: ArtemisMQ branding

2025-05-15 Thread Justin Bertram
r "all" the sizes that I could put > in > > > the favicon (16x16, 32x32, 48x48, ... 256x256)? > > > See https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARTEMIS-5450 > > > > > > If not I could create the necessary versions. If so, is there a place I > >

Re: ArtemisMQ branding

2025-05-15 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
m, so that they are available for anyone to use? > > > > > > > > -- > > *From:* ski n > > *Sent:* 25 April 2025 20:41:36 > > *To:* users@activemq.apache.org > > *Subject:* Re: ArtemisMQ branding > > > > tb

Re: ArtemisMQ branding

2025-04-30 Thread Justin Bertram
> > > -- > *From:* ski n > *Sent:* 25 April 2025 20:41:36 > *To:* users@activemq.apache.org > *Subject:* Re: ArtemisMQ branding > > tbh ArtemisMQ sound pretty neat. > > Raymond > > On Fri, Apr 25, 2025 at 8:35 PM Justin Bert

Re: ArtemisMQ branding

2025-04-28 Thread Gašper Čefarin
e the necessary versions. If so, is there a place I could upload them, so that they are available for anyone to use? From: ski n Sent: 25 April 2025 20:41:36 To: users@activemq.apache.org Subject: Re: ArtemisMQ branding tbh ArtemisMQ sound pretty neat. Raymond

Re: ArtemisMQ branding

2025-04-25 Thread ski n
ewhere along the way. > > This makes a bit more sense now. > > > > However there's still 2 distinct broker versions, right? How about just > > putting artemis on the bottom, or something of the sort? > > > > > > From: J

Re: ArtemisMQ branding

2025-04-25 Thread Justin Bertram
_ > From: Justin Bertram > Sent: 25 April 2025 17:04:42 > To: users@activemq.apache.org > Subject: Re: ArtemisMQ branding > > > Isn't it a bit confusing that the logo for ArtemisMQ says ActiveMQ? > > As far as I'm aware there is no such thing as

Re: ArtemisMQ branding

2025-04-25 Thread Gašper Čefarin
t: 25 April 2025 17:04:42 To: users@activemq.apache.org Subject: Re: ArtemisMQ branding > Isn't it a bit confusing that the logo for ArtemisMQ says ActiveMQ? As far as I'm aware there is no such thing as "ArtemisMQ." That name doesn't appear in any of our documentation,

Re: ArtemisMQ branding

2025-04-25 Thread Justin Bertram
x27;s an example of what I had in mind ... > https://imgur.com/DckgmsN > > > > -- > *From:* Justin Bertram > *Sent:* 25 April 2025 16:27:58 > *To:* users@activemq.apache.org > *Subject:* Re: ArtemisMQ branding > > There are no plans to change

Re: ArtemisMQ branding

2025-04-25 Thread Gašper Čefarin
Isn't it a bit confusing that the logo for ArtemisMQ says ActiveMQ? Here's an example of what I had in mind ... https://imgur.com/DckgmsN From: Justin Bertram Sent: 25 April 2025 16:27:58 To: users@activemq.apache.org Subject: Re: ArtemisMQ brand

Re: ArtemisMQ branding

2025-04-25 Thread Justin Bertram
There are no plans to change any branding for the web console or Artemis generally. Justin On Fri, Apr 25, 2025 at 9:17 AM Gašper Čefarin wrote: > Hi, > > > I noticed some small issues with the favicon for the new artemis console, > and before I do any pull requests I just wanted to ask if the

ArtemisMQ branding

2025-04-25 Thread Gašper Čefarin
Hi, I noticed some small issues with the favicon for the new artemis console, and before I do any pull requests I just wanted to ask if the branding is going to change, or stay the same (the web console still uses the "ActiveMQ" text inside the activemq.png picture at login screen). I assume