Network pinger solves it. Thank you!
--
Sent from: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-User-f2341805.html
The results of your test are not surprising. You've essentially reproduced
the situation discussed in the network isolation documentation [1]. Since
you only have 1 live and 2 backups you have no real quorum which can be
used to make decisions with when situations like this arise. You also
haven't
Hi,
we setup an Artemis cluster with three broker instances installed on AWS
each in a different availability zones (A,B,C).
Only one of the broker instances is configured as master, because Artemis
message redistribution does not
take message filters into account
(https://activemq.apache.org/comp
If you want true fail-over and fail-back then you actually have to
configure HA on the brokers. You've only configured clustering.
Justin
On Wed, Oct 17, 2018 at 4:32 AM Gift sefako wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> - Ideal Use Case
> We'd like to ensure high availability using failover, and then
> no
Hi all,
- Ideal Use Case
We'd like to ensure high availability using failover, and then
normalization of the environment using failback once the server which was
shut down is back up.
- Context and Environment
* We have two brokers running on two seperate servers, set up in a
cluster with
