On Sun, Sep 27, 2009 at 9:25 AM, activemq_pxe wrote:
>
> Thanks for reply.
> I intend to develop a system which fetched Market Data from a source
> (Multiple producer servers), they would push all these messages in ActiveMQ
> queues, and Consumer servers would connect to ActiveMQ, and pull message
cations do take milliseconds/
>> microseconds in
>> account.
>> --
>> View this message in context:
>> http://www.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-Usage-tp25618325p25618325.html
>> Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>>
>
olved
really? Wouldn't it be more faster if implemented in C/C++?
IMO these high performance applications do take milliseconds/
microseconds in
account.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-Usage-tp25618325p25618325.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list
On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 1:59 PM, activemq_pxe wrote:
>
> As mentioned in Use Cases of ActiveMQ, its being used in real-time,
> high-performance applications like trading, market-data distribution.
> Since ActiveMQ has been implemented in Java, I wonder that purpose is solved
> really? Wouldn't it
high performance applications do take milliseconds/microseconds in
account.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-Usage-tp25618325p25618325.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>> This is a bug that was fixed. If you get latest you should have better
>> success.
>>
>> - Jim
>>
>> -Original Message-----
>> From: pclovec
>>
>> Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2009 15:49:22
>> To:
>> Subject: Re: ActiveMQ usa
lovec
>
> Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2009 15:49:22
> To:
> Subject: Re: ActiveMQ usage from C# (WITHOUT SPRING.NET)
>
>
>
> i used the dll now ,but i didn't saw this issue. did u build the dll by
> self.?
>
>
> padcom wrote:
>>
>> Hi there,
This is a bug that was fixed. If you get latest you should have better success.
- Jim
-Original Message-
From: pclovec
Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2009 15:49:22
To:
Subject: Re: ActiveMQ usage from C# (WITHOUT SPRING.NET)
i used the dll now ,but i didn't saw this issue. did u build th
pache.NMS.ActiveMQ.Transport.Tcp.TcpTransport.Oneway(Command
> command) : Transport connection error: Index and length must refer to a
> location within the string.
> Parameter name: length
>
> Please help!!!
>
> Best regards,
> Maciej
>
>
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-usage-from-C--%28WITHOUT-SPRING.NET%29-tp22485816p22486794.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
mand command)
: Transport connection error: Index and length must refer to a location
within the string.
Parameter name: length
Please help!!!
Best regards,
Maciej
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-usage-from-C--%28WITHOUT-SPRING.NET%29-tp22485816p22485816.ht
don't know how best to accomplish this with ActiveMQ. Can
> someone advise me?
>
>
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/IBM-MQSeries-user-seeking-advice-on-ActiveMQ-usage-tp21317810p21318345.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
rk outtage (after the network recovered). I
don't know how best to accomplish this with ActiveMQ. Can someone advise me?
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/IBM-MQSeries-user-seeking-advice-on-ActiveMQ-usage-tp21317810p21317810.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing
t connection
failure, and implementing the queueing yourself?
Thanks in advance.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-Usage-tp16736018s2354p16736018.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
What you've outlined is perfectly valid
rself?
Thanks in advance.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-Usage-tp16736018s2354p16736018.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
14 matches
Mail list logo
